RIP Dr Emer.
Massive service to the country from that family.
Young lad doing the Leaving.
If you donât understand why she is wrong you wonât understand why I am right.
1 Like
Try it.
1 Like
We have been in nonsense territory regarding numbers and statistics for a long time.
So I was right to not click play. 
Nuke Gort.
1 Like
Blockquote
In her video Bailey claims the PCR test used to identify positive cases of coronavirus in New Zealand is flawed âin that it doesnât test for the virus, it tests for a piece of genetic material that we donât know the significance of".
Professor of Biostatistics Dr Thomas Lumley told Newshub Bailey is âwrongâ.
âThe test looks for genetic sequences that are only found in the COVID virus, and it has a very low false positive rate,â he said in an email to Newshub.
Blockquote
As she explained in the video, no one has properly isolated the RNA of Covid for the PCR test, so the test is bollix.
1 Like
So whatâs this Brazil variant going to mean for us then?
Smooth fannies.
9 Likes
Bigger arses
4 Likes
Smoother runways
Well then itâs a shame thereâs only 3 cases. Thanks, lads.
Big arses
Sheâs wrong, the virus has been isolated numerous times. Sheâs quoting a lad who died in the mid 19th century and another lad who claims HIV doesnât cause AIDS.
1 Like
Whatâs your opinion on PCR tests mate? There does seem to be a considerable amount of debate around them now.
Donât mind him, heâs after claiming PCR tests cause AIDs.
They are not perfect but they are the best we have by far as they are highly specific and sensitive. There is an issue with them in that they can be âtoo sensitiveâ if high amplification settings are used, which is why this setting should be reported with the test result. So for example a positive result at a 20X amplification likely means someone is riddled with Covid, whereas a positive test at X40 could be someone who is asymptomatic or already recovered.
3 Likes
You stupid fucker.
1 Like
Iâm here for you bud
1 Like