A bit like your friend Gupta, howâs she keeping?
Which of those things you listed wouldnât have happened without restrictions but with a pandemic? Think carefully. Consider it.
What?
FFS
Did you read my post. I answered the same fucking question above.
Just because you have boxed yourself off to an argument you canât win, you go down this line.
My post was answered specifically in line with the implications of the lockdown. UNIQUELY.
Here it is again.
so if we didnât lockdown during the pandemic, you think
nobody would be unemployed, no business would close
people who had disabilities and mental health issues/addiction wouldnât suffer and domestic abuse wouldnât have happened
schools wouldnât have closed
this is in the backdrop where there are no restrictions - so cases are left to run rampant. And you think none of the above get affected? And you think Iâm delirious
How would schools have been closed if they had not been closed down?
Didnât say that but itâs now Lockdown 3.0.
Why have the fuckwits that you cheerlead in NPHET and government failed on 3 separate occasions to sort this out? And at what point will they realise their policies have done more damage than good?
with no restrictions eventually the virus numbers become so much that teachers donât go to work. Itâs a highly contagious illness.
When the cases get to high it becomes a covid only approach - which we seen in March - which in hindsight was overboard but pretty much everyone was in agreement that it was needed.
Lockdowns since then are to ensure we donât go back to a covid only approach and that as much of these services are kept open as possible.
So is flu.
So much so that most winter you have hospital trolleys overflowing with sick patients.
What about a measured approach with reasonable restrictions?
Unless you do zero covid itâs the only approach
Youâve said yourself you canât do zero covid.
the other approach is to try avoid being overwhelmed while rolling out a vaccine. Lockdowns/Restrictions have proven to work when things are bad, reduce social interactions, things get good.
what do you think are reasonable restrictions for the situation we are in now?
Given how opening up things a bit over the Christmas has worked?
If lockdowns and restrictions have been proven to work then why do we keep coming in and out of them.
You are insane, man.
Thereâs people out there that will call for lockdowns if we have a bad flu season in future. I have a genuine fear that theyâll be listened to too.
why do you need something to work 100%. There is nothing will work 100% while there is a susceptible population.
The goal of lockdowns is to bring the incidence rate of the virus down, which it has achieved on numerous occasions - three in fact. Giving rise to respites in restrictions - which in turn leads to rise in incidence.
I donât know what you arenât getting here
you seem to perpetually afraid
âThe goal of lockdownâ
Yet fuck those vulnerable groups who suffer due to lockdown restrictions, right?
Itâs Lockdown 3.0 after the first two failures.
OK, youâre making the decision, right now in Ireland.
Cases are through the roof, all indicators point towards health services being overwhelmed - all of them.
What do you do?
Which countries have introduced what you would consider a âmeasured approach with reasonable restrictionsâ?
Iâd look at increasing hospital capacity and healthcare staff, getting the vaccine rolled out in a much more expedient manner. Which should have been done back in fucking March but the fuckwits in NPHET and government failed to address again and again and again.
Iâd look at realistic restrictions that will not hurt vulnerable groupings that have been completely disregarded under the current and past measure of NPHET and govt.
The real crisis here is not a pandemic crisis, itâs a healthcare crisis brought to you by successive governments who have a dysfunctional, not fit for purpose health service.