Wow. Tipped you there, Sid. Stage 5
1 Like
Well bans in March/April of last year and bans now would both be to counter the spread of a pandemic. One on Chinese people during the spread of a virus that started in, and was being spread mainly in China.
Absolute hysterical nonsense. What the Great Barrington declaration recommended was Swedenâs approach but with a greater focus on protecting the vulnerable (which Sweden failed at just as much as anywhere else). Was Swedenâs outcome a catastrophe? Try and be honest in your answer.
People like yourself and @mikehunt calling for zero Covid now are being disingenuous, you werenât calling for it when it mattered, and once the virus wasnât stopped early on it wasnât possible to stop as every country who didnât close their borders early has proven.
2 Likes
As 9/11 and Orlando proved, Islamic terrorism was the greatest threat to the US, just as Paris, Manchester and London proved in Europe. You wonât admit this because deep down you support Islamic terrorism.
See how that works?
Zero covid versus some other wankers. (âGreat Barrington declarationâ, youâd only need only read that title to know they were wankers.)
Would ye fuck off with this shite.
Yeâre all as wrong as each other.
Go back to March 24th, 2020 when leading âGreat Barringtonâ affiliated âexpertâ Sunetra Gupta claimed up to half of Britain had already got Covid.
Some posters here saw straight through her from the get go.
So you have nothing. Explain how the US governmentâs 3 month ban on travel from the 5 impacted countries was racist, and how it was a Muslim ban. Considering the countries with the highest number of Muslims (by far) were not impacted and all travelers from the 5 countries were impacted, not just Muslims.
1 Like
They were basically Gary Dempsey. But with letters.
The Oxford research gave a range of how many were infected. She was wrong, as were all the other experts at some point. The one we depended on most here in the US (Fauci) said Americans had nothing to worry about and should go on cruises. I wonder who did the more damage in terms of minimizing the threat.
1 Like
Yes, I see how it works when you post. You try to airbrush your bigotry and then make utterly hysterical claims about other people, while simultaneously ignoring the absolute clear and present threat youâve ignored for years.
Itâs a tactic Iâm well used to seeing, being quite familiar with how right-wing US media works.
Bald men. Comb.
4 Likes
She was wrong and I was right. And she has been consistently nuts since in her pronouncements. Some âexpertâ Sunetra Gupta proved, eh?
1 Like
Itâs complete nonsense. I know itâs somewhat of a hobby for the two of them, but itâs painful and irrelevant.
Theyâve actually contrived this argument out of nothing between.
Trump, a bit like yourself, is a racist. You just pretend youâre not. Being called on it tips you.
Hereâs an article that argues that it was racist rather than to protect against terrorism.
Sure look it, youâre dealing with a guy who has been a consistent apologist for mass voter suppression.
Nothing Trump did was racist, apparently, because hereâs some bullshit intelligence-insulting reason I cogged from the Wall Street Journal or Fox.
1 Like
Lolzers, âleading expertsâ. You wouldnât need a medical qualification to know they got it horribly wrong. Their silence is telling, as is your defence of them.
The con artistâs con artist, Michael Levitt, was another guy he trumpeted.
4 Likes
So youâve given up on the courts deciding the travel ban was racist and have turned to the New York Times? Iâve never denied Trump is a racist, he is, but the travel ban targeting countries was not racist, no more than Obama targeting them.
Youâre an Irish nationalist who hates people who live alongside you because they are a different ethnicity, and you think you can stand on a bully pulpit and call other people racist? Go fuck yourself you Catholic bigot.
Did he suggest we âprotect the vulnerableâ too? Weâre blessed to have such experts.