Absolutely. Thereās no way a PCR from 3 days ago is safer than an antigen from 5 minutes ago
Of course theyāre to discourage travel.
We should be discouraging travel as much as is possible because travel seeds chains of transmission.
The less travel there is, the safer things are as regards individual countries.
We should discourage everything. Forever
2 Likes
Travel led to our October wave. Travel led to our December/January wave.
Itās very easy to understand.
According to this, correct pal 
Youāre losing the plot, mate. Youāre using the well worn internet technique where you invent an extreme, caricatured position, ascribe it to your enemy and pretend this is a mainstream position that is actually in implementation already. This technique is used to avoid dealing with a sensible point.
1 Like
I dont think travel poses near the risk it did previously, given the vaccination levels in most of the countries with flights to Ireland.
āTravelā is also a very broad term. Hundreds of people a day travel to Ireland for essential reasons. They could just as easily seed the virus as a visitor. Given that they will, and must, be allowed to continue coming, I dont think itās a proportional response to ban, or de-facto ban, travel long term.
Clearly it does pose a risk given that the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant has spread fairly widely in both Britain and Ireland, ahead of where America has it in terms of proportion, though America is now catching up.
If 10,000 people a day come into Dublin Airport, yes, they could bring the variant in with them and seed more chains of transmission. But if 50,000 people a day are coming in, thatās five times the risk. Therefore it is prudent to put measures in place which will discourage travel, which will make it awkward and annoying, because it puts people off travelling. Which is what we should want.
Any increased human interaction poses a risk, especially indoor interaction. Thatās why we are not opening everything at once, weāre phasing it, while the immunity in the population is built up through vaccination.
So you agree the government and NPHET are disingenuous about the purpose of the measures. Good.
Nonsense.
But disproportionately blaming travel and having extra tough restrictions on that (which is what I think you are suggesting and correct me if Iām wrong) is pointless unless you also what to restrict every other aspect of life (hence my comment above) because, the variant IS going to come in with an essential worker/truck driver/rule flouter/whatever and will then have every opportunity to spread among a mingling population. So it just comes back to discourage everything. And thatās disproportionate to the risk, at least for now
I donāt particularly care about court intrigue narratives. I find it incredibly boring. All I am stating is that, yes, we should want to discourage international travel as much as is possible.
Well of course travel led to those waves. We had case figures bouncing around in single figures and new variants were imported into the country by travel. The more transmissible variants only get in in one way - travel. And of course Covid was originally brought into the country in one way - travel. To say international travel makes no difference is a position that is so stupid and obviously wrong thereās no reason to engage with it. Itās wanton dismissal of reality. I thought you liked to leave that stuff to Trumpists and Brexiteers.
You find it boring that a government and officials lie or mislead about the purpose or design of a measure? Thatās surprising to me.
1 Like
Itās not pointless. What you are saying is that if something is not perfect - which it certainly isnāt - it shouldnāt be done. I honestly canāt get my head around that mindset. Itās effectively to say that if we canāt have zero Covid like New Zealand, in other words a 100% effort to keep Covid out - we should do nothing at all, ie. a 0% effort. Thatās the logic.
I donāt think thatās your position but it is the logic of your position.
I find the media environment around Covid to be a barrage of bullshit from almost everywhere. And I do find most of that to be very boring.
No thatās not the logic of my position. My position is āwe cant stop a variant coming in, and unless we lockdown into perpetuity, we cant stop it spreading. So why are we denying people a right to travel to safe destinations?ā
MHQ, stopping travel through fines and requiring expensive PCR tests are token gestures that do nothing except disproportionately effect poorer people, the vast majority of whom are travelling because they have to, not because they want to. MHQ is 1800 quid. Thatās a savage amount of money and most of the people paying it right now are Indian nurses or people returning to Ireland after urgent family matters.
4 Likes
To attribute an outcome to a single factor ignoring all else is simplistic to the point of stupidity. Or even, wanton dismissal of reality. I thought you liked to leave that stuff to Trumpists and Brexiteers?
Your position was to let it rip prior to the arrival of a vaccine.
No it isnāt.