Apart from the principle being the same, itâs completely different.
The argument of the OIUTF brigade now is, âif I canât have fun, I want nobody to have funâ.
Apart from the principle being the same, itâs completely different.
The argument of the OIUTF brigade now is, âif I canât have fun, I want nobody to have funâ.
disposable mask???
Multi purpose cloth
which plan are we on now???
Vaccine passes.
Thereâs a clear route to re-opening. You wait six or eight weeks to see what happens with this variant, use that time to get a system up and running and let people into pubs and restaurants from a week after they are fully vaccinated. No pass, no entry. It canât be that difficult.
but surely the idea of vaccine passes would required some form of planning, viability and data protection assessments and a tender for the ICT services, not just a line slipped into an 11th hour letter. and if the latter, then surely not a plan
CC @glasagusban
Unvaccinated people can access indoor in Denmark with a negative test, they canât in our proposal. To say that there is no difference is just wilfully stupid. I will be fully vaccinated in a couple of weeks so your other weak as piss argument doesnât apply to me.
âApartheidâ
Also as regards Denmark, that negative test has be gotten on site at an approved testing centre, whereas Paddy demands self testing. Which means thereâs no way to even prove youâve taken a test, never mind passed one or done it correctly.
If youâre all in on the âapartheidâ train, what the Danes do is very much âapartheidâ. Except itâs not.
And fuck the young people
I donât recall any credible calls for this - could you post links please. Any of the calls Iâve seen for Antigen testing for travel, events, workplaces etc was on the basis of it being performed by trained persons.
Thereâs a massive difference between effectively preventing most young people from dining indoors and other indoor activities based on nothing more than their age and good health, and also giving them the chance to go for a test to show they are negative for Covid
But again, the OIUTF argument was âthink of businesses, think of jobsâ.
Now yis have pivoted to the opposite.
No, just open them for everyone. Itâs very simple
they arent mutually exclusive, you can full helen lovejoy for youth, the publicans, the economy, the restaurateurs and foreign travel.
no pivotting required
Theyâll have to get the excel sheet out again.
That is fucking insane
Someone might proof read Philip Nolanâs work next time out.
Well why was there such a brouhaha over yer wan at that committee meeting a couple of weeks ago so?
The general feeling I get here is that when people call for antigen testing theyâre talking about âself testingâ. âYou have to trust peopleâ has certainly been the mantra of high profile OIUTF poster @Heyyoubehindthebushes.
Now perhaps other people, people who are actually serious about the proposal, do accept that if antigen testing is to be introduced it has to be on the basis it is done by a trained person at an approved location.
But it does seem to me that âantigen testingâ has become a handy buzzphrase, and a lot those who fling it about are clueless about what it would have to entail.
But that wouldnât be very clever because it would likely lead to a serious wave.
And likely has no estimate of pre existing immunity.