Pity nobody explained the consequences to the zero covid crowd months ago. They had their fingers in their ears screaming Johnny foreigner was responsible for the death of 5000 grannies
Got it right? People die all the die irregardless. Many were already very sick people with a vast majority suffering at least one co morbidity. This arguement has been over and back too many times here. 0.03% chance of dying with covid is very small. There is very little difference in the numbers between texas and californa despite different approaches.
Iāll sign off on the covid tread for good on this. Covid 19 will go down in history as the biggest over reaction in history. Some can see it others have been caught in the hype. People need to come to terms with death instead of living in constant denial of the enviable. Get living or waste your life. Thanks to zero covid and hyper sensitive types we all have lost a year of our lives
Yes, the Zero Covid advocates got it right, those who called for opening up last summer and all through the winter and spring got it wrong. And thatās pretty much all there is to say.
What facts? Are you going to correlated restrictions to an evidential decline in numbers? Or how has the MHQ worked considering the % of case relayed to travel?
Letās look at a real world example of the difference on strategy californa vs texas. Similar populations but californa had a similar approach to us. Yet basically the same result as texas which allowed life be normal to some degree with minimal restrictions but put the ficus on personal responsibility. Texas opened up at a similar point to where we are with vaccine program and look, normality.
The basing success on the restrictions is completely specious reasoning. No one will force you to come out in public if your not comfortable but donāt have the audacity to push your views and fears onto others or the general population. Its simple leave people make their own choices based on risk.
Whatever criticism you can aim at Micheal Martin, and thereās plenty of it, this is definitely not true. I think part of his problem is that he listens to too many people in an effort to come up with policy that pleases as many people as possible, and thus ends up with muddled policy which pleases very few people. Heās a weak leader but he is not somebody who does not care and Iāve never seen anything in his political career to indicate that he is somebody who does not care. That FF as a party is in terminal decline and is nothing to do with him, Fianna Fail, and more pertinently the combined Fianna Fail/Fine Gael vote, have been in decline for 30 years.