The official link has a typo FFS 
2 Likes
He was being voluntarily imprisoned and exercising his private property rights God given to him by the Constitooootion, by squatting. And probably posting on TFK.
The Romanians up to no good as usual.
2 Likes
Correct thread -
Thousands of posts in here arguing about nothing.
Thereâs a vaccine. Take it or dont. But dont go crying if you cant get into a pub to drink pints if you decide not to get vaccinated⌠in the same way a bar man or bouncer can decide to stop you entering a premises if they perceive you to be a danger to yourself or others, well that holds true here - youâve no right to be let on any premises at any time âŚ
Iâve no idea what else is happening - I havent turned on the news in 3 months. Lash out the vaccines and get on with life as best we can. Iâm sorry thatâs not something some people with various conditions can do, but we cant cater for every single individual⌠but unfortunately, the world is all about the individual these days.
9 Likes
Ffs but thatâs just summed up the stupidity of 80% of the general publicâŚIf youâre unvaccinated you canât come into a pub and have a pint - in case you give the virus to someone who is vaccinated.
Itâs actually beautiful in itâs simplicity.
3 Likes
I think youâre the only person arguing that mate.
Wearing your tinfoil hat in these temperatures is not good for you
Do you not think youâve embarrassed yourself round here today
Thatâs precisely what you said. Donât feel bad. Youâve been brainwashed, propagandised and coerced for a year and half.
1 Like
Thatâs very vague mike. Could you be more Pacific?
1 Like
Give it a rest lad ffs. You nordies cant handle the heat at all.
More vague stumbling. You summednit up perfectly. Thereâs nothing more to add to your argument
1 Like
We should cherish @glenshane. He has an ability to consistently see hidden, higher truths that us lesser beings are unable to. He is very special.
1 Like
âstupidityâ⌠By what criteria?
Is that 80% meant to be the number of people who are prepared to be vaccinated? Otherwise I do not understand the specificity of 80%.
Are you actually arguing that no one should get vaccinated? Or that vaccination after 80% plus of the population are vaccinated is irrelevant?
You could make much the same argument about air travel or whatever. There is no âsimplicityâ involved and the answer is that vaccination is only effective when it reaches a certain percentage of the population, meaning that the further answer is a risk-reward one: that certain people, without an incentive to be vaccinated, will not get vaccinated.
There is also a broader point about fairness: why should certain people enjoy the benefits bestowed by vaccination if they refuse, without good reason, to get vaccinated?
1 Like
But I have added the decisive counterarguments.
How did you avoid being âbrainwashedâ and âcoercedâ, so?
Thereâs plenty more to add to yours tho.
Your counter argument is that a teenage girl should put her health at risk to protect you.
But you really should tackle the California/Florida comparisonâŚthere are plenty of others, but start there
I should have included voluntary practiced self policed stupidity
Get in line fellas. Meehawl and Leo have instructed you to get hall passes.
Idiots
2 Likes