Wow. Amazing internetting to dig that up. No defending that
You see Mike, when you throw an answer up like that to a fundamental question it exposes you as a bullshitter, a fanatic and a guy who deals in misinformation.
Vulnerable and elderly are dying mate.
Pregnant women arenāt, in fact they are producing life.
Anyone here Shane Coleman this morning? The mood music seems to have changed. Coleman reckons we could be facing an Italian situation soon with ambulances outside hospitals. Utter nonsense but the fear mongering is back.
Do you not think this is being done already? Are you really that ignorant?
I couldnāt tell you Iām not a pregnant woman. I think this is what should be done - not guys like you with no medical qualifications telling people to get vaccinated. See the dangerous misinformation you are pushing below.
Please address the misinformation youāre pedaling here, you fanatical nutjob.
Itās basic stuff that pregnant women go to their GP an odd time. Thatās some cocoon of tin foilery youāve got yourself wrapped up in.
No Iām very rarely Shane Coleman these days
8 Likes
The packed toilets in the Aviva have kilt us all.
You seem to be making a lot of assumptions there and still seem to be dodging the question Iāve put to you on your misinformation. It seems your outlook is based on assumptions, bias and fanaticism. I prefer to keep a rational mind and allow people to make informed decisions.
Now you can either dig deeper, show the forum youāre nothing more than a vaccine fascist who is all bullshit or you can provide the forum with the data you vaguely referenced but canāt seem to provide.
Meanwhile I will call for sensible measures that call for individual consultation with the appropriate medical practitioner on whether or not a pregnant woman is at high risk of Covid 19 complications. You on the other hand will tell pregnant women to go ahead and get the vaccine, despite not having the appropriate qualifications and will then reference data that says they should which he canāt provide.
Iām exposing you as a deranged nutjob here and youāre not doing much to refute that.
Based on your opinion here for last few months itās a complete turn from that opinion. There are people who have genuine concern for taking the vaccine but you ignore some obvious data that proves it has been effective.
Itās not. I donāt know how you could make such a comment. If you can provide a post where I said vulnerable and elderly people should categorically not get the vaccine that would be fine but such posts donāt exist.
From the outset my objection has been forcing and coercing people into getting vaccines that donāt need it.
I think people should be allowed make their own decisions on this matter and have it respected.
There is no upside to a young, fit and healthy person on putting an experimental vaccine in them for something that is of minimal threat to them. There is however potential benefits if you were old, in bad health or had an underlying condition in takin the vaccine. Iāve been very consistent in saying that from the outset through to now so I can only speculate that youāre terrible confused and misunderstood here.
Coming from you, that is of great comfort to me. The data you are looking for has already been mentioned by another poster.
1 Like
And blank.
Mike Hunt - the guy who wants to pedal misinformation out there and then lie about the data behind it.
Nutjob aligned with fellow nutjobs.
Iām asking you. What data?
The data is there. You just need to follow it.
Youāre being asked a simple question and you donāt seem able to address it. Itās a bit hard to follow imaginary data you created but donāt seem able to follow.
The data is there. Iāve told you where it is. You choose to ignore it. None so blindā¦
You thick bastard. So you studied mrna calcined in school did you? The laugh of your third hand ignorance is that the same fuckers peddling you these lies are also saying the babies are vaccinated in the womb ā¦so itās a win win.
2 Likes
You keep saying itās there but you donāt seem to have the ability to provide that claim.
If you say it you have the onus to provide it, repeatedly making claims and repeatedly failing to support those claims exposes you as a very dangerous bullshitter. Iāve backed up my position, Iāve referenced and provided a source from the WHO where they recommend that a pregnant woman consult with the appropriate medical practitioner and get the vaccine if they are deemed at high risk from a Covid 19 infections.
Iāll do it again because my position is grounded in verifiable rationale.
Should pregnant women be vaccinated?
WHO recommends the use of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women when the benefits of vaccination to the pregnant woman outweigh the potential risks. To help pregnant women make this assessment, they should be provided with information about the risks of COVID-19 in pregnancy, the likely benefits of vaccination in the local epidemiological context, and the current limitations of safety data in pregnant women. WHO does not recommend pregnancy testing prior to vaccination. WHO does not recommend delaying pregnancy or terminating pregnancy because of vaccination.
Now you can continue to show the forum what a dangerous and deceitful bullshiter by failing to provide the data you cite. Itās more evidence of vaccine fascists and their inability to discuss these matters honestly and in good faith.