I donât really get that logic of imposing yourself on everyone else. Presumably the vast majority of people who havent taken up the vaccine have worked all their lives and have contributed via taxation to the HSE. Youâre also not considering unvaccinated people with VHI etc.
Fairplay on agreeing it should be a choice though.
Tis only a cod.
Theyâve been given medical advice and want to ignore it. Grand. You donât get butter on both sides of your cake and eat it
Whatâs interesting here is the anti vaxx crowd are the same lads who are against things like social welfare - hand out culture as they call it â they shout âPersonal responsibilityâ - but then they want to side step personal responsibility here and if they should get sick they want to avail of a hand out⌠itâs fascinating to watch.
Drip drip.
Do you think this will mean three doses per year from now on? Apart from not being entitled to âfreedomsâ would there be any health implications of opting out of this ongoing vaccination programme?
Whatâs interesting is the pro Vax crowd are obsessed with personal âchoiceâ and bodily integrity in relation to abortion (for the mother that is, definitely not the baby) but now are trying to force a vaccine on people.
Two can play at this game pal.
I have said repeatedly that people are free to chooseâŚ
Ok but by conflating the decision to take a vaccine with personal responsibility, and suggesting healthcare be denied, should it also be denied to people who need it due to alcohol, smoking, diet etc? Healthcare is a human right, it shouldnât be contingent on any behaviour
Do smokers and co get free health care? I merely made the suggestion if people choose not to get vaccinated that if they end up in hospital we are now past the point of a free stay now that thereâs a vaccineâŚa stay in the ICU costs the state up to 50k a person.
Smokers and non vaxxers should be shot on arrival to hospitals.
You are suggesting they are there due to a personal decision so must pay for itâŚsame as the other categories I mentioned. Slippery slope trading healthcare for modified behaviour
But itâs only a cod so what are these people getting treatment for?
Tisnt a cod. Tisnt the end of the world either yet.
Unless you live in South Australia.
Thatâs where we keep the rapists.
Does the same apply to someone that has taken up a free vaccine and still ends up sick and in the hospital? Perhaps they get Myocarditis from the vaccine. Bells palsy? Guillain-BarrĂŠ syndrome? If someone dies or gets seriously injured from the vaccine, who foots the bill for the subsequent enquiries and payouts?
Those people took medical advice and have done their best to save humanity. The state will happily pay for those patriots.
Really? Because plenty of well-qualified, competent and indemnified doctors are warning against the risks of pushing a leaky vaccine during a deadly pandemic. Mutant viruses being shed from vaccinated is a cause for concern, but Tony says we have to take the jab so roll up the sleeve.
The state will happily pay for anyone that suffers an injury of any form thatâs attributable to any vaccine, because they have indemnified the manufacturers. Medicine by bell curve may suit you and plenty of others, but Iâd like more tailored solutions for me. I like to determine the risks and benefits of any treatment before I provide consent. Iâve been doing this for many years and it continues to serve me well.
I just do what Iâm told shur. Works fine for me.