All of Europe has an open border with each country nextdoor. If your reasoning held up theyâd all be red. They arenât and it doesnât.
You havenât answered the question.
Instead you ludicrously paint MHQ, one measure among many that should be implemented - because you need a multi-pronged approach - as the reason Ireland has a high case number at the moment.
A case number you donât see as a problem, incidentally. But it is a problem.
No I didnât. Why do you keep making up things that I say? Itâs bizarre. Thatâs one of your biggest and stupidest exaggerations yet. Why canât you debate what Iâve said instead of the the things youâve made up that Iâve said?
I said it was pointless from the beginning. Iâve been proved right and youâve been proved wrong. Itâs an embarrassment.
So now you admit that MHQ has not contributed to a single case.
Backtrack.
But the lack of universal MHQ has certainly contributed to increased spread.
Norway and Denmark both shut their borders by the way.
Your question âwhy has Ireland, which did something I donât like, now got high case figuresâ is very tabloid. And you want a tabloid answer.
If youâre that interested, why donât you have a go at writing 800 or 1000 words on the subject, because to address the subject properly would require that amount of words at a minimum. Covering all but not limited to the following: lack of universal MHQ, an open border with the UK, lack of mass testing, lack of masking in schools, employers taking liberties with demands on workers, a detailed analysis of living arrangements and age breakdowns in particular areas throughout the country, the general Irish dislike of rules, and the extreme virulence of Delta itself.
What? This is just a stupid and bizarre claim. Why do you go on with this shite?
I wonât bother reading the rest of it. Go back to exchanging long repetitive diatribes at labane.
How many cases has MHQ contributed to?
If MHQ was universal rather than cherry picked - would it have helped further to prevent cases in Ireland?
As I understand it the argument isnât that MHQ âcontributes to casesâ, itâs that it doesnât prevent them. Not to be nasty but youâre acting a bit oddly this morning, it might be a good day for a digital detox.
Maybe for me also
More gibberish. Itâs like you canât even understand basic sentences any more.
From the BBC!
Chris Whitty: âThe penny must has dropped and the government are desperately looking for an exit strategyâ
Itâs been fascinating to see your unravelling into a full blown troll during this pandemic.
That would be the argument of an idiot.
If you point that Sid has made things up youâre a troll now. I guess I should just leave you writing big long repetitive diatribes against things I didnât say?
Not one more drop of that vaccine shit is going into me, the whole thing a total farce
Youâve been making it up as been going along the whole time during this pandemic.
Youâve said so much nonsense that you donât even know what you did or did say. And then when youâre called out on it your modus operandi is to troll.
Absolutely clueless.
Sure mate.
Sure.
Still parroting that zero covid âwon the argumentâ?
Of course they won the argument. Covid was allowed spread widely and predictably has mutated into ultra virulent forms, and will likely mutate into even more virulent forms. Thereâs a good chance we havenât seen half of what this pandemic will throw at us yet.
And the world will be living with the consequences for many years, decades perhaps.
Lads here can stick their fingers in their ears and whistle away to themselves all they want, but cold, hard reality doesnât care about that.
Would any of the zero-COVID advice have stopped that? Once the virus left China and went to poorer nations (where you cant WFH and order Deliveroo), was that not an inevitability?
Your argument is that as soon as the virus escaped China, everybody should basically have given up.
We are where we are now because of that, because of trying to âlive with itâ.
Those who went for suppression escaped mass death. Those who didnât, didnât.