Paddy Jackson was also guilty as fuck. Ulster rugby, the Clintons and the Catholic Church, all a pack of sex abusers, all supportive of the peace process also but thatâs a separate issue and no excuse.
In his book The Wisdom of Psychopaths, researcher Kevin Dutton explored just how similar the countryâs presidents and psychopaths really are.
Dutton describes psychopaths as brilliant, calculating, often highly intelligent people, who feel no emotion and donât even understand what an emotion is or why non-psychopaths feel them.
Steven Rubenzer and Thomas Fashingbauer, a forensic psychologist and professor of psychology respectively, sent a personality survey used to determine psychopathy to the biographers of every U.S. president in history.
The biographers had to complete the survey based on how they thought their subject would respond.
The results, according to Duttonâs book, revealed that âa number of U.S. presidents exhibited distinct psychopathic traits, with John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton leading the charge .â (emphasis ours.)
Christine Blasey Ford and others provided the evidence
You donât count it as evidence because you donât count womenâs testimony as evidence
Unless itâs against a Democrat!
But even in that case it doensât work for you
Juanita Broaddrick swore under oath that she wasnât raped
That is a pesky fact which you still havenât gotten over
You like rape and sexual predation, as long as itâs by somebody you like, hence you simply dismissed every charge against Trump
Itâs very notable how youâve stayed so silent about Jim Jordan covering up sexual abuse at Ohio State, isnât it
Ah, heâs a Republican, and the sort of âown the libsâ Republican you like, isnât he
Juanita Brodderick has stated publically why she didnât accuse Bill Clinton publically, she was afraid of the repurcussions, given the treatment others who accused Bill were subjected to (and thereâs plenty evidence to support that, every woman who accused Bill was attacked with a smear campaign). Juanita Brodderick was also not the only one who accused Clinton of sexual assault, Kathleen Wiley and Paula Jones also accused him.
You are guilty of what you accuse me of, denying the testimony of three women who claimed they were assaulted by Bill Clinton.
Juanita Brodderick was a Democrat who supported Clinton, so had no reason to falsely accuse him. There is contemperaneous evidence from three friends and her future husband who she told at the time she was raped by Bill, and she had witnessed physical injuries to back up her claim. Not overwhelming evidence, but more than just an allegation 40 years after the event.
Blasey Ford has no supporting evidence, her claimed witness denied the event even took place, she told no one at the time, and changed her story multiple times. She also is a liberal Democrat who was adament that Brent Kavanaugh should be stopped given her opinion of his views on abortion rights.
You are wrong again, but whatâs new.
1 Like
So youâve decided arbitrarily that you believe Broaddrick and not Blasey Ford, based entirely on the political affiliation of the accused and the accusers
Thanks for that
We already knew thatâs how you operate though
None, I tend to believe Brodderick given the supporting evidence, in particular Clintonâs history of sexual assault and the public attacks on his victims.
If you have supporting evidence for Blasey Fordâs claims, please provide it. Sexual predators tend to be repeat offenders (like Clinton and Trump - see what I did there?), not alone are there no other even remotely credible claims against Kavanaugh, all of the women he worked with during his long career spoke on his behalf.
Broaddrick freely testified under oath she wasnât raped
The FBI refused to investigate all the claims against Kavanaugh based on political pressure, therefore it wasnât a proper investigation
Itâs amazing how you supported these claims being swept under the carpet
Kavanaugh was manifestly unfit to sit on the Supreme Court
Neither is Clarence Thomas
Brodderick did not testify under oath, she signed an affidavid. Any testimony she provided to Ken Starr has never been released.
She clealy was afraid to publically accuse Clinton, who was president at the time. Here are Broaddrickâs exact words âI was afraid of what would happen if I came forward. I was afraid that I would be destroyed like so many of the other women have beenâ.
Why would you doubt her when thatâs exactly what happened all women who accused Clinton?
You believe the rape claim against Trump, made by someone who was 13 at the time. Yet they have never pursued the claim, and never been identified.
Why do you think this person who is now in their 40s, not come forward and publically accused Trump? Might she be afraid of the repercussions like Broaddrick was?
The sole witness that Blasey Ford identified has denied the event in question ever took place and testified to the FBI that she was pressured by supporters of Blasey Ford to lie on her behalf.
an affidavit is sworn testimony.
1 Like
She swore under oath
So did Blasey Ford
After Blasey Fordâs testimony you trawled the far right ratholes of the INTERNET in order to try and dig up stuff that would discredit her
It was pitiful
Correct, but she has stated clearly why she signed it. She was afraid she would be subjected to the same attacks other accusers were subjected to.
Why are you defendiung the serial sexual predator Bill Clinton and calling one of his many accusers a liar? Itâs despicable misogny, based solely on political bias.
Resorting to lies now, normal fare when you have your ass handed to you.
Thereâs not one lie there
The Republicans desperately tried to discredit her, it was utterly shameful - that party is an irredeemably misogynist institution
You desperately tried to discredit her - you did it again in one of your above posts here
The so called FBI âinvestigationâ was disgraceful and was designed by the Republicans to produce a pre-meditated outcome, which it did
This regime does that with literally every issue, thatâs why it has a mafia-type fixer as Attorney General
Please provide the evidence for your claim that Kavanaugh is a sexual predator, a claim I have never seen anyone else make.
It is quite hilarious that you are defending an actual sexual predator while smearing Kavanaugh, solely because one is a Democrat and one a Republican.
Hoisted by your own petard.
Christine Blasey Fordâs evidence was extremely damning for Kavanaugh
You donât count it as evidence because you donât count the personal testimony of women as evidence - unless it happens to align with your right-wing political interests
It is evidence and extremely damning evidence
No, I correctly stated that Juanita Broadddrick swore under oath that she was not raped
I correctly stated that Christime Blasey Ford gave extremely credible testimony, which is very much very credible evidence
These are facts
Em, no
Thatâs you - you are erroneously accusing me of doing the exact thing you are doing
I am going purely on the evidence
Kavanagh is another sexual predator and another supporter of the peace process.
Sid, Forde had no evidence other than her word against Kavanaghâs her witnesses all deserted her but #IBELIEVEHER
Edit: if Forde had evidence then Clintonâs accusers had evidence too, their own word.
Broadddrick swore under oath that she was not raped
This is an inconvenient fact
Blasey Fordâs sworn testimony is enough to determine that Kavanaugh was a sexual predator and not fit to sit on the Supreme Court
Blasey Fordâs testimony was not a criminal trial, it didnât have to be of criminal proof standard
It only had to be strong enough to ascertain if Kavanaugh was likely a sexual predator, and it was more than strong enough to do that
The Republicans are more than happy to have sexual predators sit on the Supreme Court - for many of them itâs a feature of Kavanaugh, not a bug, as they are an institutionally pro-sexual abuse party
Sexual predators tend to be repeat offenders, and not give up their activities after a spot of it when they were 17. Even if you accept Blasey Fordâs account, there was no actual sexual assault, and yet you say this is worse than an actual violent rape.
Do you accept Bill Clinton is a sexual predator (like Trump) and has been all his adult life?
Do you accept Broaddrick was afraid of Bill Clinton and thatâs why she was reluctant to go public and when dragged into the Paula Jones case against her will signed the affadavid? Itâs remarkable that you deny this as it is highly likely not just plausible. Especially in the time involved when women were afraid of powerful men, and Clinton was at the time the governor (a man she campaigned for) and later the fucking president.
What has been Juanita Broadrickâs motive since 1999, 20 years ago, of claiming she was raped by Bill Clinton? Are you calling her a liar? Strange from someone who says women claiming sexual assault should be believed.
Clinging on to the affadavid issue to defend Clinton is despicable defense of a most likely rapist.
Just admit you are wrong mate.
I laid out the facts for you in my previous post
They are the facts
Facts donât care about your feelings