Further Things That Are Wrong (Part 1)

Don’t forget he was a terrorist as well.

Indeed, to the Brits he was a murdering butcher. Perspective is everything.

I didn’t compare lee to any of those people, I asked about statues. I’m trying to get to your views on statues in general. Are all statues sacrosanct?

:smile::smile::smile::smile:

4 Likes

This one is and that’s what i’m arguing for, your throwing a net around the whole idea to suit your agenda. Every statue and monument needs to be discussed on it’s individual merit and well you know it!

1 Like

Arguably worse if you consider that he devoted his massive talents and energies to the perpetuation of one of the greatest injustices in human history.

I’m not charging in Sidney style and saying you’re a pack of racists but for a lot of people saying Lee was great if you ignore slavery is like saying Hitler was great if you ignore anti-semitism. You mightn’t like that but that’s what it means for them. By a lot of people I mean any black person.

I think really these are decisions for the locals to make. I don’t think conservatives or liberals either should be piling into Charlottsville or wherever.

2 Likes

You realise Lee was staunch anti slavery?

Can you imagine being a Brit walking down Bridge St in Clonakilty and a big ignorant statue of Mickey Collins standing there giving it loads? How would it make you feel? It’s a wonder it’s lasted so long really and West Cork so full of Tans.

1 Like

They’re hippies mate up the hills in clonakilty. They probably salute the statue and get a nod back

Rommell probably opposed the Holocaust.

All these historical figures take on a meaning outside of themselves. I assume you accept that the civil war wouldn’t have happened without the abolition/slavery debate.

1 Like

Lee wasn’t fighting for slavery ---- the civil war was about much more than that.

3 Likes

I’d say auld Mick would give them a saucy wink.

1 Like

Thomas Jefferson who wrote the declaration of independence, you know, “all men are created equal”. That fella. He had over 600 slaves.

Should America be abolished?

Yes.

4 Likes

The majority of the founding fathers were slave owning racists.

The heads should be taken off Mount Rushmore

2 Likes

Anything or anyone who offends anything or anyone should be destroyed. The overarching human right to not be offended by anything or anyone is sacrosanct and overrides everything else.

9 Likes

lads, it’s a dangerous game going back a few centuries to get your daily dose of outrage.

Slavery was a main reason along with planned gross taxation on the Southern states, Lincoln himself originally stated he had no intention either willfully or lawfully eligible to abolish slavery but he could tax the maximum from agricultural profits in the Southern states. The elites were slave owners the white farmers many who were tenant workers who were poor themselves had no hope if the upper class lost out. 4% of Confederate soldiers were slave owners. Succession for the every man of the South came from a feeling of second class treatment from their Northern neighbours, look at the sheer size of the states today now imagine it’s 1861.

1 Like

Lincoln himself didnt believe Whites/Blacks were equals … lets tear down the Lincoln Memorial …

The main objection to slavery, as I understand, it was twofold - the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count slaves for the purposes of representation in the federal government irked the north ---- and the slave labour gave the south a much stronger economy.

More representation + more wealth.

There was a staunch group of abolitionists alright, but they were few and far between. The majority of people from the north did not really believe that whites / blacks were equal, they just wanted to even out the status quo.

4 Likes