It seems so, though as ever it may be just the media loving it more than anything. The court system in the UK has been utterly fucked by the Tories. Women are reported to have been asked to drop domestic battery and rape charges because there has been a delay of years to trial, with no end in sight.
Its the other way round flatty. The medics are hopelessly being compromised by the affirmation model. Sure look at the GIDS/mermaids stuff over on the mainland.
Hate speech most certainly needs to be defined before suggesting a punishment. And on the subject of punishment, whatās the purpose of punishment? To leave a person with a criminal record for life and all the consequences that carries? Or to have someone see the error of their ways/comments and re-educate them? Iāve zero idea of how the law works, but could such offences be classed as civil with community work or similar as punishment with potential criminal charges with failure to comply? @artfoley
Some crimes need punishment, others need education, and some a little of both.
This sentence was entirely punitive when it should have been 80% educational at least.
To be honest, to have draconian punishments and criminal records would be counter productive and should be reserved for egregious offences. Better to teach offenders about the other person and their perspective through education and community service.
Im far from convinced of the need for this type of legislation with the non fatal offences and malicious communications legislation already on the books. Add to that the nebulous concept of what is a hate crime at any point in time makes me uncomfortable.
Pretty much every violent crime and malicious communication has a hate aspect to it and it should be dealt with as an aggravating factor at sentencing thus negating the need for the legislation