As a new manager, you have to earn players’ respect and put a set up in place where they will bust a gut for you.
McGrath brought Waterford out of the doldrums and to a level they hadn’t been at for 58 years - genuinely challlenging to win an All-Ireland final. And those players were prepared to put everything in for him.
So the players know what a good management set up is, and clearly feel this year’s hasn’t been up to scratch.
The media circus around McGraths departure made it very difficult for the next man going in. The lads singing songs up at his house and he writing love letters to them in the media. It may have been an organic thing, but it would have taken a very strong character to go in and be accepted.
If you just said that both neither reached an all ireland final then you are correct but to say that neither lifted Waterford out of the doldrums is incorrect.
I’d agree with that to a point. But I think that there may be a case to be made that Derek had carriage of the best crop of young hurlers in Waterford since the 1950s, a group that obliterated all before them at u21 level and failed to deliver an All Ireland with them. I also think that while Derek was undoubtedly a master man manager, as a tactician he failed to evolve and stuck to a style that over time was always going to be end in failure.
In year 2 he won a league title reached a Munster final and then an All-Ireland semi-final - defeat to a great Kilkenny team was no shame
In year 3 he established them as firm All-Ireland contenders - only losing an epic semi-final replay to Kilkenny by a point
In year 4, he went extremely close to winning the All-Ireland final
Year 5 was a disappointment but that’s sport
Waterford developed a distinctive and attractive style of play which was very successful
They faced constant calls to abandon that style of play, and when they did under the new manager, we saw the results - they were humiliated in this year’s championship
Derek was right all along
He’s also a top analyst and an all round alright sort