It seems youâre the one thatâs having a laugh as earlier on the thread you were advocating for the âlawsâ of the Egyptian regime to be upheld.
Earlier on you argued this:
Thatâs a direct contradiction.
It seems youâre the one thatâs having a laugh as earlier on the thread you were advocating for the âlawsâ of the Egyptian regime to be upheld.
Earlier on you argued this:
Thatâs a direct contradiction.
Where was mob rule advocated by me?
I simply pointed out your childish bleating and inability to look beyond whatever flavour of the month is in the Irish Times to get behind.
Once again, you just make stuff up.
No it isnât. Itâs unsurprising you are a failed journalist as you have such a very poor grasp of English.
Do you not understand the difference between holding a belief and advocating for a belief? In the case of the KKK for example, individuals should be free to hold these crazed beliefs, but should not be free to advocate for them and try and influence others. There is no way to control what individuals believe but we can control the teaching of beliefs.
Should someone in Ireland be allowed set up a school to teach the beliefs of the Nazis?
Oh, I certainly do. It seems you donât. And I know that advocating for a belief within laws is not a crime.
It also seems that you, along with numerous other posters here, have decided to form your own private thought police, whee you act as judge and jury.
A couple of months ago you were performing all sorts of mental gymnastics to defend actual white supremacists who were demonstrating in Charlotteslville.
Your debating skills really have reached rock bottom if youâre resorting to this.
If you donât mind Iâll ignore the moral guidance from someone who has been jumping though hoops to defend a child molester and people who advocate for genital mutilation and forcing nine year old girls into marriage. For someone who throws around the pedophile charge at other posters you seem very keen to defend actual child sex offenders.
As for Charlottesville, imo the KKK and other hate groups should not be allowed hold public demonstrations.
Seriously? Is this the best you can do?
Youâre now arguing directly against what you argued previously.
Everything Iâve said is factual. I donât agree with the law on free speech and freedom of expression in the US. Hate groups like the KKK should not be allowed hold public assemblies or advocate their beliefs publicaly.
Note I said hate groups, as in actual hate groups. In your warped mind all conservative views represent hate speech.
Youâve spent the last two years on here basically pulling yourself off talking about the US constitution and the âfounding fathersâ.
Now youâre disagreeing with the first amendment.
Thatâs a hell of a backtrack. You didnât voice any of this stuff in August when it was actually happening. Instead you were trying to draw false equivalence between far right white supremacists and Nazis and people on the left.
People who go around with flaming torches shouting Nazi slogans are part of a hate group.
Thatâs another little fantasy you have.
What is undeniable though is that conservative politics in the US has a serious problem with hate speech.
Can we not all agree that halawa looks like a complete cunt, and leave it at that?
Hilarious
Is that Waterford whispers? They can be very witty.
Jesus Christ
I can see Ibrahim becoming the new Baz Ashmawy off the back of this.
Think weâre ok for Z list celebrities with drink driving convictions.
Ibrahim wonât be picking up a drink driving conviction. If only others would follow his extremely responsible lead in terms of road use.
Fairly bland Halloween costumes on display thereâŚ
He should be in guarda custody instead of the television
Tubs will hit him with the hard questions? This will be no soft interview.