Yes.
If youâre reckless as to whether you cause an outcome, you should be fully responsible for the consequences.
The charge relates to the outcome. If she just mounted the footpath and hit the gate of the creche it would be a lesser charge with less severe penalties. The more serious the consequences, the heavier the penalty.
So, blind luck in other words, dictates the severity of the prosecution.
Same as most everything else. If you throw a punch and end up killing a fella it likewise comes with heavier penalties
Yep, luck. Not saying its wrong, but it sits uneasily with blind justice.
The auld one really held a grudge going to her death .
1 Like
He was a real looper
Easy knowing you hadnât to scrimp and starve to save âŹ20k to leave to your grandchildren.
I hold the virtue of forgiveness. Harden not your hearts . Hebrews 3:15
1 Like
3 Likes
Continuing the long held west Brit tradition of the senior judiciary.
Born in Belfast. Christian Brothers boy. Unlike yourself.
Iâm a Christian brothers boy
Welcome to the club. You always struck me as a Jesuit. Apologies.
2 Likes
I have a torn ear to prove it.
1 Like
And a torn hoop?
2 Likes
The Christian brothers werenât that way inclined.
The paramilitary wing of the Catholic church was their greatest descriptor
1 Like
Weâd presentation brothers/ mostly ok bar the token cunt who delighted in putting a few through hell
Plenty of them were
1 Like