But on this⌠Are you suggesting if someone takes offence and labels it hate the police are obliged to arrest and issue a court order and the accused has to then prove their comments werenât hateful all based on the accusers word? Presumably this is where you support the stateâs right to confiscate a persons phone to try and cement the claim of the accuser?
Then it would be a good idea to cool the jets and take a deep breath and think about what you are tweeting.
It all seems very, very arbitrary and aimed at shutting down speech.
We all know what hate is and hate speech⌠But this is clearly designed to shut down counter arguments.
Itâs authoritarian.
Yeah I fully agree. Anybody on Twitter now is mad and inviting trouble.
The Bill expressly says that it doesnât shut down free speech. Rational discussions of the topics are protected.
Itâs secular blasphemy laws.
Nature abhors a vacuum I suppose and the decline of organized religion has led us here.
we have a presumption of innocence. if youre not convicted by a court then there shouldnt be a pulse record. no fair procedures
Rights (rabid) Activist for Trans
The police are not obliged to arrest. The investigate a claim in the same way as they would any other crime and as with any other crime they can apply to court for a search warrant if they have reasonable grounds for suspecting an offence took place.
Thanks Art
Whatâs rational? I donât believe a biological man can ever be a woman. Thatâs based on biological facts and science. Is that hate if i express it?
I think the Muslim religion is backwards and barbaric based on the way many Muslim countries treat women and gay people. Is it hate to call it barbaric? I think Tippos are all inbred, is it hate to express that?
Did you read the Bill?
Itâs defined in the bill isnât it? Iâve posted it for you to read a few times if you could be bothered your hole.
I did. Iâve given you scenarios above where i have used rational and evidence to make a claim.
In the bill it refers to a gender other than male or female. Can you tell me what that is?
Elmo
There isnt any other
I think that is known as âotherâ.
Itâs extremely vague and arbitrary ⌠Along with our facial recognition technology itâs the start of a very slippery slope but perfect for people like you who like to shut down debate
Whatâs vague or arbitrary about it?
Itâs effectively the same definition we have had since 1989 without any obvious issue. Itâs seems to have put the wind up a few people who want to spout on about trans people on the Twitter.