His pronoun stance was that he has no problem addressing a person by the pronoun they would prefer⌠But he would not be coerced into using language by authorities. Itâs not the state, or a universities place , to tell people how and what they should speak once a person is not inciting hate.
A perfectly acceptable stance in my book.
Itâs like youâve skimmed through some guardian article on him and thatâs your mind made up.
Would you be happy if your employer forced you to use certain language in the morning?
Unfortunately she didnât, mate. Peterson retweeted exactly that the other day.
Youâve been on here all day calling excellent, loving parents âNazi-likeâ and for years have been slabbering away over the every word of somebody who retweets male milking fetish porn to children.
Time to put away your keyboard for good, you utter freak.
This fella is where some lads here go to get their parenting advice.
Psychologist, former professor, and self-help author Jordan Peterson retweeted a fetish video of a penis milking porn clip on Saturdayâseemingly duped into believing that it was footage from inside a Chinese communist sperm-extraction factory.
The tweet, from user @songpinganq who frequently posts supposed videos of Chinese state surveillance, said âWhatâs going on in China? Three Children Policy?â with a clip from a fetish porn shoot of a row of people lying on a table getting their dicks sucked by pumps dangling overhead.
Peterson quote-tweeted it, writing, âSuch fun in unbelievable techno-nightmare CCP hell.â The implication, it seems, is that the Chinese Communist Party is running dystopian bondage forced ejaculation clinics. Or something!
The tweet and Petersonâs response instantly went viral, with the moment earning its own Know Your Meme page in what has to be record time. @songpinganq apologized a few hours after Petersonâs quote-tweet, saying that they stumbled into the video on WeChat and believed it to be a real sperm bank.
