Another abject example of your ignorance.
Sad really as you have the potential to display occasional intelligence, if your ego allowed it.
Psychology in general is bullshit, populated by bullshit artists like yourself. Clinical psychology is reputable as it is actually based on the scientific method.
Not that you would understand the difference.
As a poster of honour I donât break the confidence of what people say in PMs.
Not just his quals which as I said are only a starting point for anyone.
Itâs his years of experience and all his other work collectively
Iâm calling you out as a bullshit artist and making a very rational, articulate case for it.
You are trying to bullshit your way out of it and getting aggressive and frustrated about how futile it is.
Why donât you regale us with another conspiracy theory of how everyone is out to get you?
Leaving the serious discussion to the adults is another projection from you.
People without the moral fibre to express in public.
Weak insecure people
We are being lectured now by a lad who pretends he doesnât have a cock.
There is no such thing as âthe scientific methodâ.
There are different scientific methods, a nuance which is clearly lost on you.
You can come up with any scientific method you want, but it canât change the fact that somebody is an arsehole with views stuck in the 1950s pontificating on subjects they have no more authority to speak about than Padjo down the bottom of the street.
Only someone utterly ignorant of science could say there is no such thing as the scientific method.
The whole basis of modern science is based on the scientific method, you dumb fuck.
If you genuinely believe that, please release all text messages and e-mails that you have sent and received both privately and in relation to your business in, oh, weâll say, the last week.
Better than being lectured by a lad who pretends he has a clue when he doesnât.
I never ever said everyone is out to get me.
What i actually said is there are 2 people in the town talking shit and acting very insecure in regards to me or any cross over work wise, sporting wise or socially. One of them in particular is undoubtedly a psychopath. What I said was these would be the types of people who would revel in such rumours or would even be capable of using someone to set someone up.
Thatâs not everybody. I have an ever growing successful business in this town. That does not happen being someone you would like me to be.
However you are naive in the extreme to believe these people do not exist. It just so happens in am one step ahead of these people all the time. My success is getting some people healthy is making a small group of possibly dangerous people quite dangerous. It would be foolish of me not to keep an eye on it. I share experiences so others may become aware or learn. No other reason.
My eventful and meandering life makes you uncomfortable though. Thatâs something you and have to deal with fella. Not me.
Nembo can talk for himself. If he has any balls
I think I have a better clue about the typical male condition than an affirmed asexual.
This is comedy stuff.
Youâre claiming that one mythical âscientific methodâ exists.
And youâre using it to try and back up something that you say is not science - quite obviously because you agree with its ideological agenda.
There is no science that backs up peopleâs desire to be an arsehole. Thatâs just being an arsehole. And shit comes out of arseholes. Iâm pretty sure science will back that up.
It looks like youâre the psychopath here.
I saw how you tried to defame a fellow peer in David Matthews on here without a shred of evidence all because he is a lot more successful in his field than you are.
The world does not owe you a living and weâve all noticed how you try and bully and intimidate posters on here with fake threats of legal action on here when they probe some of your bullshit claims.
All bark, no bite, little doggy.
Thereâs your problem right there, you seem to have a delusion you are informed on matters you have little understanding of.
You are the one who claimed to be asexual.
David Matthews is not a peer. He is a former athlete bluffer.
And itâs noticable that he doesnât really seem to be an s&c coach anymore either.
Another injury filled year last year with the gaa team he was with.
And I am self employed. Thatâs the exact opposite of thinking anybody owes me anything .
But someone in a government job would never get that. Ever
Iâll put that in non-deluded, non-psychopathic terms for you.
You are not a peer of David Matthews if anything.
He is a former Olympic Athlete who is far more renowned in the S&C sector, you are a former unskilled construction labourer and bluffer.
I see youâre still trying to defame the man without a shred of evidence to back it up. Childish.