Mr OâHiggins, who was instructed by Dublin solicitor Eileen McCabe, said the review revealed that in Rebeccaâs business exam script the examiner had given her 17 plus 19 plus 30 but had then wrongly totted up the marks to 56 instead of 66. Had the error not occurred Rebeccaâs final total points would have surpassed what was required for veterinary medicine.
Surely it should be a simple case of the body acknowledging the mistake as an administrative error, correcting it and reissuing her results. Either some thick headed cunt manager with no life made that decision or someone at a low level stonewalled her. Either way itâs a disgrace.
Just not good enough.
You fuck up every time you post on here goofy.
and yet I didnât fuck up so badly that Iâm living in a crumbling soviet era tower block.
Forgot to carry the 1.
Yerra she can allways reapply next year. Head off to Australia there on the lash.
Would her place be guaranteed or will it be subject to another round of CAO offers?
They should give her a nod and wink and bate on.
not really the point (sic) though is it? She already repeated, let her get her veterinary degree and then fuck off to Oz and mind a few kangaroos or sharks or whatever then. Its utterly ridiculous though to see such a glaring error and they wont just say yeah sorry, we fucked up, hereâs your new points tally, off you go.
Rules are rules - you cheating Patriots bastard.
She repeated already? Fucking waster. Give her nothing.
I see you are on the @artfoley bandwagon with this viewpoint as he already declared a similar thought. Well done.
Art is smart.
thinly veiled âi repeated the leaving certâ from you there.
Well done on getting enough points first time. Look at you now, carrying a civil servantâs bag around Europe.
Living the dream. Getting a bus from Amsterdam to Brussels at the taxpayers expense.
yeah, my own.
who the fuck are you, you no mark cunt
i suspect that young lady is not cut out at all for veterinary medicine