Itâs great to see you recognise the State and itâs legitimacy.
Magazine editor says 'more information' to come on Varadkar story
Magazine editor says 'more information' to come on Varadkar story
Itâs great to see you recognise the State and itâs legitimacy.
I donât. You must have imagined that, Blueshirts have very strange moral applications.
Surely he recognises the State?
Of course he does. He was clear yesterday he did.
The state.
Ah grand. Shur heâd have to, to exist within it.
Mary Wilson is a fairly poor addition to the Morning Ireland crew.
Sheâs fucking useless. She was useless on 5-7 live as well.
They should have put her back down the four courts doing courts reports. (I am aware it is only a commercial court now so we would hear fuck all from her).
I never heard her before until that time she made a fool of herself trying to interview Michael OâLeary recently. She really is extremely weak and Iâve no idea how she ended up in such a prestigious position.
She really is extremely weak and Iâve no idea how she ended up in such a prestigious position.
Itâs RTE. It happens routinely.
Was she the one that Michael OâLeary ruined? He told her he was pro-facemask before NPHET, you canât put NPHET on a pedestal, etc?
- I donât know why the NAGP are not. @tallback seems to suggest that there was a lot of politics at play in how these things worked. They wouldnât be the only Unions/representative bodies in this country where deals are done separately or one is separated out. The NBRU would take a very different stance to the other transport unions, for example.
Rival union leaders must agree on common strategy
For years the only competition CIE has had to face is internally, between the National Bus and Railworkersâ Union and SIPTU
We have seen the impact of these things in the various transport strikes over the years, the recent Bus Ăireann one in particular.
There seems to be occasions in the past where the IMO have reached an agreement, with summaries put to the press and where the NAGP took it up and went to the media to bash it.
- because they were not an official party to the negotiations. But they were to be âconsultedâ. The dynamics are clearly weird there and well beyond any one person, donât you agree?
- I didnât see the WhatsApps/messages like that. Tbf there were a few photoshops of messages going on so maybe one has been constructed. Regardless, the Taoiseach is never going to want it out there, that is obvious ffs
I donât have an issue if your thing is here that âleaker, he has to go regardlessâ, but you have been flailing around here for 2 days looking for some sinister motive. First it was the NAGP looking to be seen as âin the knowâ and connected, then afterwards when it was in fact that they werenât going to release the name at all, it was sinister for that reason -the contradiction is clear to see. On the face of it, there doesnât appear to be any sinister motive involved or looking for personal gain (beyond simply the business of Government and getting a deal done), with this being an effort to get around the politics of the IMO/NAGP and get the deal ratified. This is realpolitik, not corruption or someone being sneaky for public profile.
If we are going to force the resignation of politicians for any form of leak then we are not going to have many left. It will also put journalists in an interesting position as they always enjoy the fruits of leaks. You canât be egging for resignations when that will dry up your sources. Maybe itâs for the best overall and politics overall, I donât know.
the leaking is a huge problem and to be very honest id be happy for them to end as theres never any investigation by the media as to the âwhyâ of the leak, at this rates most of the leaks are for political reasons or kite flying. that said, id have zero problem with whistleblowing.
take the NPHET letter leak, RTE has questions to answer on that as the âwho leaked itâ is central to the story.
i was supposing to leos motives but Iâm sure village has a lot more in store which will come to the fore after leo finishes answering questions in the dail tomorrow
Did anyone see the âiâ before âeâ except after âcâ mistake in OâTuathaillâs statement last night? Disgraceful. âRecievingâ.
When two vowels go walking
The first does the talking
Magazine editor says 'more information' to come on Varadkar story
Drip, drip, drip.
Varadkar wonât know what to admit to now when he makes his speech in the DĂĄil
Youâve got to love it. Release a bit. Let him take a position and then make him look a mug. I presume theyâll wait to see what knots he ties himself in when he addresses the dail
Drip, drip, drip.
Varadkar wonât know what to admit to now when he makes his speech in the DĂĄil
given all the people hes leaked to itll be death by a thousand cunts
Celebrity medic @DrZeroCraic up to his neck in this scandal.
Almost a year after the implosion of GP representative body the NAGP, Niamh Cahill and Priscilla Lynch examine the colourful history of the organisation and where its legacy lies In July 2013 a new GP representative organisation, the National...
Its launch followed the controversial departure of IMO CEO Mr George McNeice from the Organisation with a huge pension pay-out of almost âŹ10 million at the end of 2012, which led to a large number of GPs resigning from the union.
While in 2014 the NAGP announced it had secured a negotiating license via an arrangement with the Independent Workers Union of Ireland and was optimistic it would enable the Association to take part in contract negotiations, this never came to fruition. The Government signed up to a memorandum of understanding with the IMO on GP contract negotiations following resolution of the CCPC issues and alleged the NAGP did not have affiliation with the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and could not be a formal party to such negotiations.
While the HSE did engage with the NAGP on a range of general practice-related issues, including the pre-general election rural practice deal agreed by the Government in 2016, the NAGPâs absence from official negotiations on contract issues would remain a major stumbling block for its members until its demise in 2019.
Former Minister for Health Leo Varadkar gave the NAGP a cold shoulder following the under-sixes contract stand-off, despite strong pressure from NAGP members and conciliatory overtures from the Association.
However, the next Minister for Health Simon Harris took a more diplomatic approach and eventually invited the NAGP to the table on what was claimed to be a new GP contract. But, it was very clearly stated by its rival that the NAGP was only involved in âdiscussions and consultation as opposed to real negotiationsâ
https://www.medicalindependent.ie/a-rollercoaster-ride-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-nagp-2/
Its launch followed the controversial departure of IMO CEO Mr George McNeice from the Organisation with a huge pension pay-out of almost âŹ10 million at the end of 2012, which led to a large number of GPs resigning from the union.
While in 2014 the NAGP announced it had secured a negotiating license via an arrangement with the Independent Workers Union of Ireland and was optimistic it would enable the Association to take part in contract negotiations, this never came to fruition. The Government signed up to a memorandum of understanding with the IMO on GP contract negotiations following resolution of the CCPC issues and alleged the NAGP did not have affiliation with the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and could not be a formal party to such negotiations.
While the HSE did engage with the NAGP on a range of general practice-related issues, including the pre-general election rural practice deal agreed by the Government in 2016, the NAGPâs absence from official negotiations on contract issues would remain a major stumbling block for its members until its demise in 2019.
Former Minister for Health Leo Varadkar gave the NAGP a cold shoulder following the under-sixes contract stand-off, despite strong pressure from NAGP members and conciliatory overtures from the Association.
However, the next Minister for Health Simon Harris took a more diplomatic approach and eventually invited the NAGP to the table on what was claimed to be a new GP contract. But, it was very clearly stated by its rival that the NAGP was only involved in âdiscussions and consultation as opposed to real negotiationsâ
The beginning of the end
In late 2017 cracks began to appear in the NAGPâs public image and concerns began to emerge from some NAGP council members regarding finance and governance. A rising deficit was among the first alarm bells sounded, causing some concern among ordinary members.
A five-figure deficit (âŹ33,000) was mentioned in the early 2017 AGM report and this was raised by a member at the AGM. It turned out staff pay at the NAGP for an average of three employees over a 15-month period was more than âŹ300,000, according to its abridged financial statements from 1 January 2016 to the end of March 2017.
The statements also revealed that income totalled âŹ835,000 for the 15-month period compared to administrative expenses of âŹ895,000, amounting to an overspend of around âŹ60,000. But the income included almost âŹ190,000 in debtors, largely made up of unpaid âmembership and sponsorshipâ, which would mean that actual income was âŹ645,000.
This was only the beginning, however, and the NAGPâs financial issues would continue to escalate until it became completely insolvent.
Abridged financial statements for the NAGP for the year ending 31 March 2018 revealed a deficit of more than âŹ114,000. The figure represented a significant increase based on financial statements for the end of March 2017, which showed a deficit of âŹ33,000.
Over the course of late 2017 and early 2018, a number of NAGP council members had been raising concerns and seeking answers on a number of issues. Frustration grew as questions were dismissed and went unanswered. As originally revealed by this newspaper, in early 2018 the NAGP lost six council members, including the then incoming President Dr Yvonne Williams. Many of these members raised concerns about financial and governance issues, and potential conflicts of interest within the Association. Some former high-profile spokespeople for the organisation quietly began to back away from the NAGP.
Following a report into governance arrangements at the Association, a number of changes were recommended. Remaining council members for months tried in vain to introduce the recommendations, while the Association continued its work for GPs, issuing press releases and hosting meetings, but to no avail.
A âwhistle-blowerâ document making a number of astonishing claims about the NAGP and some of its officials came into circulation in 2018, adding further fuel to the fire of negativity surrounding the Association.