Is this not just a case of @Scrunchie trying to plug his uncle’s book?
I’d say it reveals about the same as a TV3 documentary on the topic.
Mybuffalobill will be very disappointed not to get a mention.
On the topic, i saw a complaint to GSOC which alleged the involvement of one of the gardai from operation trace…
Jury empaneled for Graham’s trial and proceedings get under way in the warning. That sounded like an unusual comment from Judge Carney, excusing potential jurors of a squeamish disposition? Frequenters of the website alt.com also excused from having to fulfill their civic duty on this particular occasion as well.
Are you a friend of Graham’s Manuel?
scrunchies uncle comes across really badly here, failing to do his job in catching the perps or finding the bodies yet profiting from their deaths
Released a book for fuck sake sake.
What good is a book now?
[QUOTE=“farmerinthecity, post: 1077167, member: 24”]Released a book for fuck sake sake.
What good is a book now?[/QUOTE]
Maybe he can throw his book at the perp instead of the book
@The Selfish Giant[/USER] and [USER=24]@farmerinthecity are great fella’s to jump to conclusions and sit back from on high and make judgements. God forbid you’d read the book before hand though, sure that’d give you too much information to make a learned, informed decision. Best off think you’re right without the facts.
He’s actually written the book with the full permission of all the families, who want to keep up the hunt for the killer(s) through awareness and keeping it in the media spotlight. He also hopes that it might jog people’s memories somewhat as he gives complete timelines (that you wouldn’t get in newspaper) and also he calls out certain people who know things and/or have given alibi’s to the main suspect which they doubt (especially in Wexford’s Fiona Sinnott case). As for profiting - he’s not. The circulation isn’t big enough and the first print run has him out of pocket in getting it published.
Keep judging people though guys. The more people you belittle the better standing you’ll have in your own minds.
[QUOTE=“Scrunchie, post: 1077171, member: 1408”]@The Selfish Giant[/USER] and [USER=24]@farmerinthecity are great fella’s to jump to conclusions and sit back from on high and make judgements. God forbid you’d read the book before hand though, sure that’d give you too much information to make a learned, informed decision. Best off think you’re right without the facts.
He’s actually written the book with the full permission of all the families, who want to keep up the hunt for the killer(s) through awareness and keeping it in the media spotlight. He also hopes that it might jog people’s memories somewhat as he gives complete timelines (that you wouldn’t get in newspaper) and also he calls out certain people who know things and/or have given alibi’s to the main suspect which they doubt (especially in Wexford’s Fiona Sinnott case). As for profiting - he’s not. The circulation isn’t big enough and the first print run has him out of pocket in getting it published.
Keep judging people though guys. The more people you belittle the better standing you’ll have in your own minds.[/QUOTE]
Incorrect use of the apostrophe.
[QUOTE=“Scrunchie, post: 1077171, member: 1408”]@The Selfish Giant[/USER] and [USER=24]@farmerinthecity are great fella’s to jump to conclusions and sit back from on high and make judgements. God forbid you’d read the book before hand though, sure that’d give you too much information to make a learned, informed decision. Best off think you’re right without the facts.
He’s actually written the book with the full permission of all the families, who want to keep up the hunt for the killer(s) through awareness and keeping it in the media spotlight. He also hopes that it might jog people’s memories somewhat as he gives complete timelines (that you wouldn’t get in newspaper) and also he calls out certain people who know things and/or have given alibi’s to the main suspect which they doubt (especially in Wexford’s Fiona Sinnott case). As for profiting - he’s not. The circulation isn’t big enough and the first print run has him out of pocket in getting it published.
Keep judging people though guys. The more people you belittle the better standing you’ll have in your own minds.[/QUOTE]
bullet points please
you snivelling fuck
Strike 1
Ah come on now Scrunchie. Keeping it in the media spotlight? It’s rarely out of the media spotlight.
Barry Cummins from RTE wrote a book on it. And I think @Fagan ODowd 's lady Sarah McInerney wrote one on it as well.
Maybe that is why it is not selling?
What comes out about this fella is going to make Joe o Reilly look like an alter boy.
Tell us more.
Is that a site for altar boys
[QUOTE=“Scrunchie, post: 1077171, member: 1408”]@The Selfish Giant[/USER] and [USER=24]@farmerinthecity are great fella’s to jump to conclusions and sit back from on high and make judgements. God forbid you’d read the book before hand though, sure that’d give you too much information to make a learned, informed decision. Best off think you’re right without the facts.
He’s actually written the book with the full permission of all the families, who want to keep up the hunt for the killer(s) through awareness and keeping it in the media spotlight. He also hopes that it might jog people’s memories somewhat as he gives complete timelines (that you wouldn’t get in newspaper) and also he calls out certain people who know things and/or have given alibi’s to the main suspect which they doubt (especially in Wexford’s Fiona Sinnott case). As for profiting - he’s not. The circulation isn’t big enough and the first print run has him out of pocket in getting it published.
Keep judging people though guys. The more people you belittle the better standing you’ll have in your own minds.[/QUOTE]
I bought the book yesterday am v intrigued by these cases, I started reading this morning en route to work - I’ll keep ye posted