After an acquittal?
Iāve educated you pal, youāre welcome
I wasnt aware it was tied to the result. The provision of legal aid shouldnt be tied to guilt or innocence.
But I will freely admit I am not an expert on the intricacies of the NI legal system like 6 or 7 lads on here.
If it helps you to think that go aheadā¦
It isnāt, itās based on meeting a financial threshold, and thatās not the question you asked.
Now youāre channeling sid
Thatās a low blow. ()
The order would be requested post trial to clawback fees. Not in advance of provision of the legal aid. Id imagine it is more utlised where someone may be asset rich but cant access these assets whilst a trial is pending
And youv answered a question you wernt asked
You must have got a bang on the head if thatās what you recall
Either that or turned the head the other way
But you can bet your bottom dollar that if there was an application for a clawback thereād be a cross application like PJs at the moment for the state to pay those fees.
Whateverā¦ He probably doesnāt think heās as bad as you and vice versa
Now thatās a low blow.
I must say this is probbaly my favorite exchange on tfk ever.
if there was an application for a clawback
So they could make an application for a clawbackā¦or revoke or dischargeā¦ or place conditions on the granting of a certificateā¦
And do you expect things to move that quickly?
But you can bet your bottom dollar that if there was an application for a clawback thereād be a cross application like PJs at the moment for the state to pay those fees.
So they could make a request for the order. Thats all I asked. Thanks for answering
Thank you, youāll allow me that muchā¦maybe
@Mac, I am a few hundred posts behind in reading on this thread. Is it worth catching up?
No. Not even a quick scan
@Mac, I am a few hundred posts behind in reading on this thread. Is it worth catching up?
I gave up a long time ago mate. Iād suggest mark it all as read and move on