Popular or critically acclaimed bands/artists that you hate

I admit I have not. Was that from pre-missing member?

He wrote most of the lyrics for it. I’ve had no interest in MSP for about 10 years now but their output from 1990-1996 or so is excellent.

Will check it out. I am open to changing my mind.

Do that.

Though, personally I prefer their earlier stuff.
:cool:

:clap:

He’s done it again.

Super Furry Animals, never got the shit about them.

He’s done it again.[/QUOTE]

Just confirming that farmer is not a music snob, just a common garden philistine

Counting Crows

Colourblind is a magical song.

Outkast (record number of Grammys for a group)

Eric Clapton

Paul Weller

[QUOTE=“TheUlteriorMotive, post: 922445, member: 2272”]

Eric Clapton[/QUOTE]
Ah come on now, mate.

Look mate, you mentioned Radiohead and I kept my mouth shut.

He hasn’t written a decent song in 40 years

[quote=“TheUlteriorMotive, post: 922445”]Outkast (record number of Grammys for a group)

Eric Clapton [/quote]

Clapton and Weller :clap:

Outkast - no way.

Any band that features road bowls (and curling) in their videos is a good band

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv1h3VSQjf8

Yeah but you can’t hate his early work surely?

[QUOTE=“TheUlteriorMotive, post: 922445, member: 2272”]Outkast (record number of Grammys for a group)

Eric Clapton[/QUOTE]
Disagree on Outkast, they are class.

And while not a huge Clapton fan, the fact that he hasn’t produced anything new good in a long time doesn’t mean his old stuff isn’t still genius. By that reasoning we could throw in the stones which would be ridiculous. Also, while U2 may be a bit annoying and bland for over a decade now, but they have a huge back catalogue of really good music.

Fleetwood Mac: They have some good songs alright but overall I couldn’t be arsed.

Pink Floyd: Certainly don’t hate them but are overrated in my view.

David Bowie: See Pink Floyd.

There’s a difference between being critically acclaimed and being popular.