Jackson’s solicitor went straight on the offensive.
He painted the trial as a being based on a case with loads of holes in it which should never have been brought to trial and was only done so because Jackson was a famous sportsman.
Ok - he was found not guilty. But I think its a bit rich going on such an attack when it is clear that some lying definitely went on between the four men.
Nothing you’ve said during their trail has been very clear.
Madden & Finucane who built a legal practice largely on he back of defending alleged provos against the might of the British legal system now have their proteges defending Ulster rugby players against the might of the British legal system.
You still haven’t clarified why you assert that the opening statement of prosecution counsel constitutes evidence in a criminal trial. One of any number of bizarre utterances you made on this trial.
Lads seething because they adopted a position on the INTERNET and are wrong. Clutching at straws as the precipice they went out onto collapsed beneath them.
This thread was never about a rape trial. This thread was a battle between posters. The self styled debating experts and the lads who were sick of their shite and decided to take them down.