Youâre defending a mass murdererâs ârightâ to mass murder and invoking propaganda by a Putinist to do so.
Thatâs your level.
You are a very sick person.
Another big day of it for the lads. By God, incredible stamina. Like a Russian army digging in for a long winter.
2 Likes
Iâm comfortable with the sources Iâve provided, their accuracy and veracity.
the fact you havenât been able to counter one single thing said, and have resorted to this speaks volumes.
there really isnât much more to be said here, but, again, if it makes you feel better to make me the enemy, which for some reason it does, carry on calling me whatever you want, it doesnât really hold any weight
Yeah, there is no more to be said. You take the side of the mass murderer and the side of despotism.
As you do with Putin.
you canât counter one single thing in that post and have now resorted to this.
I donât do any of that
Zzzzzzz.
The headbangers here want to completely shut down any discussion about pre invasion. That period clearly paints the west in a negative light and these guys can only have one bad guy to deal with at any one time.
1 Like
It doesnât justify the invasion in any way shape or form, it seems you have to preface everything with that or you run the risk of being called a murderer.
Thereâs also no justification for the West destabilising the Ukraine in 2014. I mean there is hard, irrefutable evidence of Nuland handpicking who they wanted in after Maidan. She even says lets get UN to bind it because Russia will torpedo it, and fuck the EU. Exact words, fuck the EU
Why?
No. Russia bad, west good.
When you look at the causes of any conflict whatâs always written is- good guys and bad guys. Itâs never complex or multifaceted. History has taught us this lesson.
go look it up yourself. Iâm sick of handfeeding you
Would that be the same David Morrison who denied Assad gassed his own people?
The same David Morrison who gaslighted that Russia was not responsible for the Skripal poisoning and claimed it was opponents of Russia that did it?
Yes, it would. You sure pick your sources well, not.
is the article wrong? argue the point, please
If you defend a murderer you cannot complain about being called an apologist for a murderer. Which is what you are.
You seem to think youâre entitled to some extreme form of political correctness in any words towards you.
You arenât.
If they can discredit anything about the person, then the point has no relevance. Thatâs how the left continuously shut down discussion.
I donât think Iâm entitled to anything from youâŚ
Your insults are like water off a ducks back at this stage and are just there because you are incapable of countering a single thing outlined
you have very little credibility.
go back to sleep
If somebody is an Assad gas attack denier and a Skripal poisoning denier nothing they say has any credibility.
In the same way those who pushed Ivermectin and hyrdoxychloroquine when it was obvious they did not work cannot be taken seriously on anything.
In the same way those who defend a murdererâs right to rule by tyranny and murder, which you do, those who continually make excuses for a fascist imperial genocide, which you do, cannot be taken seriously on anything.
notice how the real sticking point, the Nuland tapes, are just completely brushed over. Handpicking the next government from the opposition. Nothing to see here lads⌠all above board
My word.