Fair enough. Glad to see you had an extra bowl of weetabix this morning
They need to stop just pissing people off with stupid policies, immigration (IPA system), institutional buying of properties (over 50% of new homes in Limerick in 2023 where bought by institutional buyers), woke nonsense and poor awarding of contracts that then overspend
Yeah but @Julio_Geordio âs point still stands. If it doesnât directly affect you and you lead a reasonably comfortable lifestyle, youâre not actually going to give a fuck.
What system would you have for immigration would you have that aligns with the 1951 refugee convention and EU assylum.laws mate.
This should be good
Fyi
Irelandâs main obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention and EU asylum laws are focused on providing protection to individuals fleeing persecution and ensuring fair treatment throughout the asylum process. Here is a breakdown of these obligations:
- Non-Refoulement (1951 Refugee Convention)
Non-refoulement is the core principle of the Refugee Convention, which prohibits Ireland from expelling or returning (ârefoulingâ) an asylum seeker to a country where their life or freedom would be threatened due to race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion. This protection applies regardless of whether the individual has been formally recognized as a refugee.
- Right to Apply for Asylum
Under both the 1951 Convention and EU law, Ireland is obligated to allow individuals the right to apply for asylum. Asylum seekers must be given access to a fair and efficient process to have their claims for protection assessed.
- Fair and Efficient Asylum Procedures (EU Asylum Laws)
The Common European Asylum System (CEAS), through various EU directives and regulations, requires that Ireland provides fair, transparent, and efficient asylum procedures. This includes the Asylum Procedures Directive, which sets minimum standards on how applications should be processed and the rights of asylum seekers during the process (e.g., the right to legal assistance and the right to appeal decisions).
- Protection from Persecution
Ireland must recognize and provide refugee status to individuals who qualify as refugees under the 1951 Refugee Convention definition: those with a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
- Subsidiary Protection (EU Law)
In addition to refugee protection under the 1951 Convention, the EU Qualification Directive obliges Ireland to offer subsidiary protection to individuals who do not qualify as refugees but who face serious harm (e.g., death penalty, torture, inhumane or degrading treatment) if returned to their home country.
- Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers (EU Reception Conditions Directive)
Ireland is required by the Reception Conditions Directive to ensure that asylum seekers are provided with adequate standards of living during the process. This includes housing, healthcare, education for children, and access to legal representation. Irelandâs system of Direct Provision, which provides accommodation for asylum seekers, has been criticized for not always meeting these standards.
Simple as this, majority are coming from countries that are not at war, pass through multiple safe countries to get here and lose documents on the way despite getting on a plane where your documents are always checked.
Top of my head warzones like Syria, Palestine and Ukraine ive no problem with. Why are Nigeria, Algeria and Georgia high on the list of applicants?
Ok mate, how does that differ or change from our current policy and how would you implement this bearing in mind international rules i.e. right to apply for asylum
E.g. under international law, a person from Nigeria can claim asylum in Ireland if they meet certain criteria. Asylum is granted to those who can demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution or serious harm in their home country. The relevant legal frameworks that apply include:
- 1951 Refugee Convention:
Ireland is a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, which define the criteria for refugee status. A Nigerian national could claim asylum if they fear persecution based on:
Race
Religion
Nationality
Membership of a particular social group (e.g., LGBTQ+ individuals, women facing gender-based violence)
Political opinion
The key principle under this convention is non-refoulement, which prevents states from returning asylum seekers to a country where they would face persecution.
- European Union Law:
Ireland, as part of the EU, adheres to the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), which provides specific protections:
The Qualification Directive (2011/95/EU) establishes minimum standards for who qualifies for international protection. This includes both refugee status and subsidiary protection for individuals who face serious harm (e.g., the death penalty, torture, or inhuman treatment) but may not meet the strict refugee criteria.
The Asylum Procedures Directive (2013/32/EU) ensures that all asylum seekers have access to fair and efficient asylum processes.
The Dublin Regulation determines which EU member state is responsible for processing an asylum claim, typically the country where the asylum seeker first entered the EU.
Examples of Grounds for Asylum for Nigerians:
Boko Haram: Many Nigerians flee areas affected by Boko Haram, an extremist group responsible for widespread violence, particularly in northern Nigeria.
LGBTQ+ Persecution: Nigeria has harsh anti-LGBTQ+ laws, and individuals facing persecution on these grounds may qualify for asylum.
Gender-Based Violence: Women facing forced marriage, female genital mutilation (FGM), or other forms of severe gender-based harm may be eligible for asylum.
Conclusion:
A Nigerian can apply for asylum in Ireland if they meet the criteria set out in the 1951 Refugee Convention and EU asylum laws. Their claim will be assessed based on whether they can demonstrate a real risk of persecution or serious harm if returned to Nigeria.
Yeah thatâs true we probably have the most left wing right wing parties in Europe too.
Funny how Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Italy are all changing policy now
These changes comply with international law mate
In beginjng to thinj you are just full of inane soundbites
Germanyâs recent immigration policy changes in 2024 are generally in line with international law, but they also reflect national priorities, especially concerning labor market needs and asylum procedures.
-
Asylum and Deportation: Germany continues to respect its obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention by offering asylum, but it has taken a tougher stance on rejected asylum claims. The new Repatriation Improvement Act extends detention for deportation cases and aims to increase deportations. While Germany still processes asylum claims and offers protection to those eligible, it is working to expedite deportations for those who fail to qualify, which can be controversial but remains legal under EU regulations.
-
Skilled Immigration: Germany has significantly reformed its laws to attract skilled workers, introducing easier pathways like the EU Blue Card, which now has fewer barriers, such as language requirements, and a points-based system to attract talent. These changes align with EU labor migration frameworks and international labor standards.
-
Naturalization and Integration: Reforms to the Nationality Law speed up citizenship for well-integrated migrants and allow dual citizenship, further supporting integration. This is consistent with EU principles of integration
Are you having a laughâŚthis government is as left as fuck. We have had notilhing but lefties for years.
When you are a far right bigot everyting is on your left
Imagine this eejit named himself after a leftwing music group.
More name calling from the Greens. A real leftie trait.
Liked the music. Might be hard to comprehend.
It is actually. How can anyone that likes massive attack become such a gammon?
Do you lefties do anything but call names? I stand by what I have saidâŚirish political parties are heavily left leaning. Im sure why the lefties get so hot under the collar about it.
Great posting pal . A level of depth not oft seen in these parts.
Iâd say itâs more a case of people looking at the alternatives and not liking them. People donât trust SF and people donât want the lefty headbangers of Greens/SD/PBP in power either So they are just sticking with what they know.
Greens are lefty headbangers? Would have thought theyâd be pretty mainstream.
Yes and yes.
FFG have had to become more Sinn Fein than ffg to stay in power.