Aine had allegations in the late 80s. Gerry had proof in 2000.
Iâll stop asking you what should be a very easy question to answer now as you clearly think itâs ok to keep proof of child abuse to yourself
And?
What difference does it make if the RUC were not interested in it?
Are you for or against Kangaroo Courts?
They had no interest in allegations, they may have had interest in proof. Its simple really
No interest in allegations!!!
WTF!!!
Are you listening to yourself here?
You said it mate. Youâre using a late 80s allegation as proof that they had no interest in actual proof in a post Good Friday Agreement world
They didnât.
A victim going to the police and telling them they were abused is an allegation.
A third party going to the police and telling them that an abuser confessed to them about abusing a victim is also an allegation, it is not proof.
You seem to be defending the RUC from not investigating allegations of child abuse. It is up to the authorities to investigate, they refused to, not much anyone else can do about that.
You think itâs ok to not do anything when somebody tells you theyâve abused a child
Absolutely not.
The RUC are the only ones with authority to do anything and they ignored the allegations but for some utterly bizarre and incomprehensible reasoning you are defending them from not investigating allegations of child abuse.
What you are saying is absolutely incredible, have you read it back.
Police force ignores allegations of child abuse.
So what Gerry did is wrong then? Because thatâs what he did
Gerry Adams has no authority to investigate and charge paedophiles. You are as thick as a ditch if you canât see that the RUC were the ONLY ones who could have investigated this, they were aware of the allegations but ignored them.
Unless you are advocating Kangaroo courts?
But Gerry did nothing when someone told him they abused a child. Youâve already admitted that is wrong, therefore Gerry was wrong in your opinion
But Gerry.
Gerry Adams has no authority to investigate child abusers, the RUC had, were fully aware of the allegations and did not pursue them.
It takes a special sort of simpleton to point the blame away from the police here unless of course you are advocating Kangaroo Courts?
Gerry should have kneecapped his brother, obvious solution.
I think a Kangaroo Court would have been the best option, agreed.
Actually, on a serious note, I gained a huge amount of respect for Enda Kenny for the way he handled all this. Youâll remember that the Indo cabal were pushing for it to be a major issue but I thought Kenny was very decent and very dignified. He just said it was a family situation and he didnât want to go into it. Meanwhile that dirty weasel Meehole went along with the Indo agenda and was strongly praised by Eoghan Harris and the like but rejected by the electorate.
If Enda ever runs for President I will definitely give him a vote for how he handled it, at least a number 2 but possibly a number 1.
Itâs a victimless crime
He deserves to be heavily criticised for it. It was deplorable behaviour
Why am I being tagged here?
Because I was speaking about dodgy insurance claims.
