You believe conjecture over conjecture? - what?
I believe scripture over conjecture.
Believers and non believers alike all fully accept that the bible has been edited umpteem times by religious and semi religious church/political figures over 2 millennia — they did so using conjecture.
So you believe conjecture over conjecture.
Bizarre statement to make.
Terrible echo in here
It’s a fascinating tale. Bart Ehrman’s “Forged” is a great read.
I believe the scripture over conjecture.
Yes - we established that you believe conjecture over conjecture already. There’s no need to repeat yourself.
There’s that echo again … again … again
It is not conjecture to say that the bible has been re-written, adapted or, to use Ehrman’s word, forged over the centuries.
It’s a forgery!
No I’ve established that I believe the bible over conjecture.
bible = conjecture.
Bible = scripture.
Scripture doesnt me ‘truth’ ffs ---- it was all edited over centuries and centuries to read like any tom, dick or harry wanted it to read.
How do you feel about catholic teachers?
Ah FFS! though we may get more than a short sentence in reply
scripture
/ˈskrɪptʃə/
noun
noun: scripture ; plural noun: scriptures
- the sacred writings of Christianity contained in the Bible.
So the bible is the sacred writings of Christianity contained in the Bible
I didn’t say it did. You seem to be having problems understanding that I put more weight in the bible than idle speculation.
The bible is idle speculation.
I think the priests should be back teaching. My best teacher was Fr Malachy.
You don’t know that.
So you believe the bible word for word?