They were irregular versus other British police forces anyway. Think someone posted above the weren’t allowed join the British policing union because of it
OK sorry I thought when you asked if France would commemorate the Vicky police you must have been drawing some sort of comparison between them and the RIC. Maybe you just happened to be wondering that today and just posted it in this thread because it was busy. Let’s not fight, carry on.
I certainly can’t handle your truth which seems highly warped.
It’s a good metaphor for a lot of the nonsense on here though. We should never forgive Lemass for accidentally discharged a gun when he was 16 and an active member of the IRA, tragically killing his infant brother, but we should trudge up to Soloheadbeg every year to commemorate those who slaughtered their fellow Irishmen in cold blood before war was declared.
This is what I was thinking too. The group tasked with this didnt even recommend a commemoration, despite tim telling us it was discussed in the minutes on their website. they did acknowledge the RIC and their role in this era and how it should be recognised as a historical piece, which I’d have no issue with either.
But in its place, as part of an exhibition or documentation of records to get an understanding of it all. Not as a state commemoration. Just because we can look at our past and accept what went on and be forced to “mature” doesnt necessarily mean we have to think they were following orders or rewrite history that the RIC were a great bunch of misunderstood lads.
The issue of it being uncomfortable doesn’t even come into it because only valid comparisons can be uncomfortable and your comparison is completely laughable and trivialises history in a child like manner
The most valid comparison hasn’t even happened yet
It will be how the RUC are commemorated in any future united Ireland, circa 2100, when it is a century since the RUC was disbanded
Such a commemoration would be pretty much identical to this in terms of the issues it raises and the feelings it arouses
And yet such commemorations, including to the dead of the Provisional IRA etc., will be essential in the new state
That was my feeling too - is it Charlie Flanagan that pushed for this commemoration? He’d have history of trying to push Shinner buttons and I suspect they thought they could take the high moral ground and call these “rapid republicans” immature and unworthy of being involved in grown up politics etc etc. They were actually going on the front foot as recently as the weekend and picking battles on that basis.
But it’s backfired quite spectacularly in that it’s generated at best a lot of disquiet and in many cases revulsion across the board, and not just in what I think was their intended target. Ferriter’s statement adds further to my belief that this was a Flanagan solo run.
Sir Neville Chamberlain (not that one, the other one) who is credited with inventing the game of snooker during his time in India was Inspector General (ie highest officer) of the RIC from 1900 to 1916.
I’ve been at one Soloheadbeg commemoration. This years one. According to Diarmuid Ferriter “the commemorative model to mark the centenary of the Soloheadbeg Ambush is the correct approach to the observance of the sensitive and complex centenaries that will occur in 2020.”