You obviously learned well there.
Getting back on topic, controlling immigration is not racism. Literally every country on earth has an immigration policy and determines how people legally enter the country or remain legally in the country. Muddling this with treating people who are in the country legally as āoutsidersā is nonsensical.
Little boy, little brain,bye bye, couldnāt possibly have a discussion with an idiot who doesnāt know what hes on about,advice ,live life,travel,live in a few countries,be proud of our country and the leadership of 16/22 who made it easy for a Langer like you to spout whatever you like,now fuck off, plastic paddy
What a weirdo you are.
The direct provision system is a joke.
They brought in a ridiculous token system last which supposedly allowed asylum seekers to work but the bar was set so high only a handful of people have successfully navigated it.
Youāll have the same people in those towns complaining that rural Ireland is dying, yet now they have an opportunity to bring an influx of people into the area and they are literally burning them out.
Iād be fairly blasĆ© about a lot of things but this really annoyed me when I heard it this morning.
This newbie has @anon7035031 reeling on the ropes here. What an opening few weeks heās having.
Itāll be a struggle for some if Cork find any form. Carry onā¦
Big leery grin from meš
It doesnāt take much, in fairness
Hereās what you wrote.
Immigrants into the UK have been legallly accepted into the country.
You say immigration, ie. immigrants, āare destroying the UKā.
Inherent in that is an assertion that those people are āoutsidersā and āless deservingā than the native population.
By your own standards, what youāve said is flagrantly racist.
The stupid cunt attempts to warp and redefine the word racism to suit himself, and still ends up a racist under his own definition. You couldnāt the thicker than that
Your efforts to cling onto Sid are embarrassing.
I said literally every country in the world controls immigration. There are exceptions, some countries have made truly stupid decisions on immigration, such as the Blair government in 2004 in effectively allowing open borders (something other EU members such as Germany, France, etc. didnāt do). You can trace the roots of Brexit back to that, and itās not based on racism, itās based on anger at stupid policy by the UK government.
The thing is, heās completely redefined racism from what he previously defined it as.
He started the thread to have a go at me. Yet the irony is thereās absolutely nothing in the comment he quoted by me at the start of the thread that claims superiority of one race over another, which was his definition of racism before he went and arbitrarily changed his definition for convenience.
Heās a gas cunt in fairness
āOpen bordersā literally means open borders, ie. completely free movement.
It doesnāt mean what you have decided you want it to mean for obviously cynical and disingenuous arguing purposes.
Schengen is āopen bordersā. The UK does not participate in Schengen.
The UK has open borders with Ireland, and only Ireland.
Given that youāre against open borders, we can presume you want a hard border in Ireland, so.
None of what you posted had anything to do with what I pointed out, by the way, which was that what I quoted by you was flagrantly racist by your own criteria.
Iād say its highly unlikely those who committed the arson attack are from Rooskey*. But Iād have a mind that those who did it may well be receiving support, publicity-wise and possibly financial-wise too, from the Ruskies.
*Is it Rooskey or Roosky? I always thought it was Rooskey.
Sinn Fein/IRA fingerprints all over this hotel burning
Was it yerself, by any chance?
You open your borders, provide freedom of movement or provide simple visa processes to a third country via agreement.
The US has had a big problem with illegal immigration.
Whether the wall is cost efficient or effective, it isnāt racism to want improved border controls to stem illegal immigration.
Donāt have time to educate the simpletons. The attached article outlines the huge miscalculation of the Blair government. The UK, Sweden and Ireland were the only EU countries in 2004 to open up their borders to the new 8 members, all other 12 members imposed ātransitional controlsā. The result was instead of the 13,000 migrants per year predicted by the Blair government, it became 60,000 per year (conservative estimate), and net migration to the UK reached an average of 247,000 per year during the 2005-2010 Blair government.
Thatās the source of Brexit, plain and simple.