Thiem has won 5 of his last 7 v Djokovic, 3 of his last 4 v Nadal, 5 of his 7 games against Federer. He is the only player outside the big 3 with the game to consistently best the big 3.
I know you don’t like facts and you should not comment on tennis after your laughable comments on Borna Coric.
You might not have been up out of bed early enough to aee it this morning, but as someone who was, Thiem tanked it in the third set, threw in the towel and went down 6-0 in a gutless capitulation.
You seem to have ignored the points I made as you are still reeling from how I dismantled your last post. Thiem is the only player outside the big 3 who has consistently had the goods to take it to them which is contrary to your argument.
Thiem tanked it and threw in the towel this morning. Odd that you won’t address that.
Why have you now changed tune? You wanted to talk about Djokovic, Nadal and Federer and Thiem’s ability to beat them and now you don’t.
Typical Chairman Dan, always running away.
Dominic Thiem was the one that ran away from
The fight this morning. Odd that you don’t see fit to address that.
Why have you ran away from the earlier point you made? Are you embarrassed that you have been found out as a fraud once again when it comes to tennis?
I made three points this morning.
Dimitrov is a supremely naturally talented tennis player.
Thiem tanked it and gave up in the 3rd set this morning against Dimitrov.
Thiem nipped in to win his only career Grand Slam to date at the US Open 5 months ago, when Nadal and Federer weren’t in the field and Djokovic was effectively absent as well after an early tournament disqualification.
You as usual are off on a tangent, referring to Thiem’s world ranking, some obscure reference to one of the lower seeded players, Borna Coric and frantically googling for Thiem’s head to head record against various players across a myriad of lesser tournaments.
Try to stay on point please.
More holocaust denying from you.
Unfortunately for you Thiem is the reigning US Open Champion and the only player around at present who has an excellent record against the Big 3.
The fact that you called Thiem a dud years back and cited Borna Coric as a rising star shows how little you know about tennis.
Thiem has been a slam finalist 4 times, he’s a slam winner, world no 3, excellent head to head record with the big 3 (better than Federer)
Leads Federer 5-2
Trails Djokovic 5-7
Trails Nadal 6-9
Dimitrov on the other hand
Trails Federer 7-1
Trails Djokovic 9-1
Trails Nadal 13-1
If you want further embarrassment coming your way please reply to these points.
Rattled
You’re afraid of addressing the points.
Petrified.
Dimitrov destroys Thiem over the first two sets so much so that Thiem throws in the towel and tanks it in the 3rd set and you’re off frantically googling Dimitrov’s head to head record against Nadal, Federer and Djokovic. Bizarre.
Stay on point now please. Odd that you won’t comment on Thiem tanking it this morning.
You’re deflecting away from the path you wanted to bring it down again.
Coward.
Interesting to see if Djokovic is really injured here.
Nothing really wrong with Djokovic on a fitness perspective.
When Raonic’s serve is going, he has the best serve in the game.
Djokovic will come through this comfortably, he’s well set up for the final now.
Raonic’s 1st serve in % is way too low to beat Djokovic.
Raonic has a set back to level it up at 1 each.
He has never been able to get rid of that belly.
Djokovic showing a load of bravery and resilience here playing through the pain barrier with his injuries.
So you must be saying now that Federer has been guilty of sour grapes in the past given his comments about Djokovic and injuries?
“I don’t trust his injuries. I’m serious. I think he’s a joke, you know, when it comes down to his injuries,” Federer said.
Thanks for clarifying that.