Most likely you deleted it. Reference to it has been made before though.
And you letting something like that happen is entirely believable, in fact itās probably to be expected.
Most likely you deleted it. Reference to it has been made before though.
And you letting something like that happen is entirely believable, in fact itās probably to be expected.
Jesus youāre an angry horrible bastard but this made me laughā¦ Behind all the puff pastry and fish cakes!
Not alone do you spend days sitting in the Dark crusading for the state to go easy on paedophiles you are also fantasising about other peopleās kids watching adults engaged in sexual activities.
You need help.
Youāre the one whoās just associated the word āfantasisingā with the words āother peopleās kidsā.
But again, thatās not a surprise, itās to be expected from you.
Fish pies
Thereās no hierarchy of crimes but what Humphries did was heinous, it was sustained and it was calculated against a very vulnerable and naive young person. Whatever about certain crimes I donāt think you can defend the person behind that.
Donal Og seems to more or less have gotten a free pass on this.
a person believes the perpetrator of a crime accepts the seriousness of their offence, is genuinely remorseful for what they have done, will not reoffend and, if applicable, is prepared to receive treatment designed to ensure they do not reoffend, they have every right to give a character reference on their behalf, and giving that reference is not an āevilā, even if it is misguided, and I use the word misguided deliberately.
You donāt know if cusack knows ot believes any of this, you are imagining he does. The heinous nature of the offence means any person giving a reference for such an offender should be questioned as to his motives and own values really. But cusack believed he would never be caught in this case, just like humphries. And like him is now backtracking in hindsight.
You donāt know if cusack knows ot believes any of this, you are imagining he does.
From what we know of Cusackās character over the years he deserves the benefit of the doubt that he believed all that.
What do we know of his character?
Humpries should be locked up for life
Indeed and you were fantiscising about a child watching adults having sex, because you didnāt read it on this forum thatās for sure. Its all in your sick little head, along with that weird passion you have to win some leniency for paedophiles.
You need help.
What do we know of his character?
We know he was outspoken for getting a proper set up put in place for his county team and took no shit from the authorities.
We know he was courageous in coming out out as the first publicly gay player in the GAA and an advocate for equality.
What is in his character to suggest he doesnāt deserve the benefit of the doubt?
Indeed and you were fantiscising about a child watching adults having sex, because you didnāt read it on this forum thatās for sure. Its all in your sick little head, along with that weird passion you have to win some leniency for paedophiles.
You need help.
zzzzzzzzzz
How does any of that suggest he deserves the benefit of the doubt? All that suggests is that heās courageous which he clearly is. You can be courageous and a cunt at the same time
How does any of that suggest he deserves the benefit of the doubt?
By using the phrase āthe benefit of the doubtā, youāve anwsered your own question.
We donāt know enough about his character to know whether he deserves the benefit of the doubt or not
Your pinning everything on the end resultā¦ Any sane person would agree no one deserves to be raped. Iām talking about actions prior to putting yourself in a dangerous or compromised positionā¦ Iām not saying just because you did you deserved to be raped but the simple fact is millions of rapes happen every year and will continue to happen despite all your internet shite talk. None of them deserved it but many of them could have made better choices. Not all of courseā¦ But by fuck if I ever had a daughter Iād raise her to expect the worst and to stay safe and not throw herself at anything that moves.
That was a weird segment with Paul Kimmage on Claire Byrne Live.
Utterly surreal .
Care to expand pal