Republicans were up in arms with their witch hunt portraying a supposed epidemic of sexual assaults by transgender people against women and girls in school bathrooms.
There were none.
There was an assault by a boy against a girl, for which the boy was convicted.
The entirety of the right-wing media portrayed that boy as transgender. He was not.
That assault - by a boy against a girl - was entirely irrelevant to the supposed epidemic of sexual assaults by trans people against women and girls, which was in fact non-existent.
Virginia had not even implemented any bathroom law.
The entire thing was a right wing witch hunt.
Now youāre going crazy claiming I āvictim blamedā simply because I linked to an article which described what happened.
Sure heās the same guy who wonāt address Bill Clintonās past either. He will put on a big virtue signaling display and then defend violent sex offenders if they are politically aligned with him.
Thereās a nasty culture on here of a cohort of posters using child abuse or sexual assault as some sort of political football or to score points but will then run for the hills when an allegation or case arises to their political preference or favoured party. Itās lower than a snakeās belly.
For what anyone says about me, I always treat an internet debate with integrity. Case in point yesterday, I gave my views on the vaccination program, provided the data underpinning my views and linked the source of that data. You had the chance to dispute that and you responded with an anecdote and calling me a liar when I had substantiated my points and referenced where I got my data from. You could have disputed my points but you decided just to call me a liar and post some unverified anecdotes - thatās engaging in bad faith.
You are the expert of engaging in bad faith. You are right about nutjob Sid but you ought to pay more attention to your inability to engage in good faith.
Is this the same case?
Is @Tierneevin1979 encouraging us to believe conservative propaganda?
Surely not! Isnāt he a democrat? a middle of the road, non-racist, non-Trump supporting, all round good guy?
I am. I always treat a debate with integrity. Iāll put my argument forward and state the rationale behind it and link it with data and stats if needed. You on the other hand opt for cheap shots and dishonesty. Heed your own advice.
There you go confirming your simpleton status again.
My post is entirely accurate. A rape of a child occurred and the boy involved wore a skirt to gain access to the girlās bathroom. Did I mention transgender? That would be no. The school board led by Scott Ziegler denied it happened at a parent meeting, even though they clearly knew it happened. The boy was transferred to another school where he assaulted another girl.
Try not to misrepresent what I say, you are coming across as Sid lite, which isnāt a good look.
What you are dealing with here is an ideologue who believe everything from left wing sources as gospel and everything from right wing sources as lies. The truth as always lies somewhere in the middle.
You also have the issue of almost all commentary on US matters on this site framed in terms of left versus right, which is the reason most people get US politics wrong. 50% (used to be 40%) of prospective voters in the US now identify as Independent and will vote Democrat or Republican depending on the choice involved. This is how you get Biden winning Virginia by 10 points but McAuliffe losing the governorās race.
Handily enough to suit your agenda you leave out pertinent information and twist other parts. Youāre a racist ignorant jackass. But hey, give us a laugh again.
