I guess college kids as well, and more importantly people who realise its a joke having to pick between just two 70 year old plus pensioners who maybe billionaires who ultimately wonât change anything in their lives for them really.
Mad a good amount of lads on here do be hanging off his every word
The fix is in alright
1 Like
North of 60% is good by US standards, 50-55% for past few decades. A lot of young people donât vote here, every election they are predicted to come out and vote but never happens. We voted here in Cali to let ex cons vote, a just decision.
Sleepy Joe not fucking around 
1 Like
His first bad decision, how about pressurizing China to take it seriously?
how is it a bad decision?
1 Like
Thats what hes doing
Weâre very lucky in a way that the lockdowns have more or less achieved the 7% reduction in carbon without any economic impacts this year here.
The Paris accord doesnât address the most pressing global environmental problem, which is China and itâs total disregard for the health of the planet. You are aware of their coal plant program in Africa I assume?
The outright whinging and crying from the Republican and Trump brigade across the board tonight is something to behold
1 Like
I suppose in a lot of states the perception is that it doesnât matter as the result is pretty much locked in anyway. May explain some of it. Still thatâs an awful lot of votes gone to waste. All the talk of polarisation in the country no one ever mentions the 40%+ that canât be bothered or are not allowed vote.
1 Like
surely the US needs to be committed to reducing carbon irregardless of China?
They are though, emissions have been dropping steadily since 2005. The US is the global leader in technology to reduce carbon. Have you heard of Tesla?
who has a higher carbom emmission per capita? China or the US?
The US has gone from 21 metric tons to 16 since 1980, China from 1.5 to 8. Given Chinaâs 1.5 billion population compared to the US at 330 million, which trend do you think is more worrying?
Poor oul Donald. Heâll be in jail getting his hole widened. 
oh, they are both terrible, the US plans to reduce carbon under trump was terrible with Chinas plans slighty better
Just confirms what I said, US has been declining since 2005 and China accelerating.
Republicans looking to replace Don with Tucker, per source