Hes good for the economy. And I think we all realise his a bit harmless now. Warmonger he is not. The media tried to sell that at the start of the election. Seems to have a decent relationship with Korea and Russia. And his onto those chinks too. Canât be too dim.
Iâm not rabidly pro Trump. Wouldnât mind a new voice for 2020 tbh, though he is great entertainment, particularly how he has ruined your e-persona.
Lets cut out the typical Twitter badges you lot like to fix to people and look at policies.
I am very much in favour of free trade, but not in the Patrick Minford respect. I see it as a gradual thing, that works for balanced power worldwide and also for the citizens that use it. Of course there will be occasions when brave decisions need to be made that might cause short term harm to people, but that is cost of things and the cost of leadership. I never had a problem with Trump wanting to reengage the US on the world trade platform, as the US is a huge economy that can soak up short term tariffs while it reasserts itself. That is why Trump is âanti EUâ, because he is engaging in a worldwide power play. Ultimately we all need to be friends but he had a valid point on the impact of free trade on large swathes of the US and the behaviour of China. That was a policy that was thought out and enacted.
Johnson in comparison is a free trade enthusiast, but wants to leave the biggest free trade area out there and is prepared to do so on WTO terms. All for slogans.
I am also largely in favour free movement of people. But people should have border controls. The EU is a project about bringing similar types of countries together and allowing free movement. That is not comparable to the illegal immigration that Donald Trump is against. The âwallâ is policy and is consistent with his overall motives. Boris Johnson on the other hand went from espousing the benefits of Turkey joining the EU to whipping up fear over it within a couple of years, with immigration to the fore. I have no problem with people criticising the EUâs migrant policies on refugees and how Merkel overstepped the mark on Syria, but the overall EU freedom of movement policy is sound. Boris is in favour of it and has previously called for more of it, but then switched tact.
BJ has no consistency in policies. He promoted the most damaging post war move for UK ever, because he wanted to shore up leadership votes. Nobody knows what BJ will actually do as leader.
That wall of text is simply a long winded way of trying to justify a laughable and totally incoherent stance through mental gymnastics
Trump and Johnson are two cheeks of the same arse, both extremely shitty, Trump more so
You cannot be taken seriously when you stoop to such bizarre attempts to justify fundamentally incoherent and contradictory views
It shows you are dreadfully confused and simply making things up as you go along
Your initial line is dreadfully stale and boring, itâs sad to see somebody continually recycling the same stale material, itâs pitiful to see really
Although I suppose in one way itâs nice to see a right-winger embrace recycling, pity itâs the only way
Sure if he dies in the next 12 months for one thing then he wonât be their candidate, heâs well into his 70s and lives off fast food. So you canât say nearly zero percent.
Itâs an actual, substantive discussion on their respective policies.
But I know youâre just about slogans and name branding. Thatâs just the way it is.
Iâd say it will be stress of Twitter or something that could break Trumpâs health down. That would be a big win for Sid tbf.
Itâs a laughable attempt to justify a laughably incoherent position
One of the things Iâm excellent at is cornering the likes of you and the other right-wing thickos on this forum into having to make laughable justifications for fundamentally contradictory positions which cannot be simultaneously held without making you look like an utter plank
You eejits all have a touch of the Father Ted trying to explain why he stole the whistle about you
Itâs tremendously funny
Job done, yet again
Have a good night Sid.
1 Like
Self praise is no praise. I thought weâd been over this?
I donât follow her on Twitter nor do I have an unhealthy obsession with her as you do, so donât know much about her views other than she comes across as not very rational and perhaps not well mentally. From what I have read elsewhere apparently her husband died of a neurological disease a few years ago, which must have been life changing for her. In that regard I would have empathy for her, something of course you are incapable of.
In terms of my own views, they are consistent with the great majority of American and I would venture the majority of Irish people. Most normal people like myself are in favor of controlled immigration, are pro business and lean conservative on economic issues and liberal on social issues. Radicals like yourself whether on the left or right are in a very small minority.
In your delusion you actually think people agree with you, in that regard you are Gemmaâs soulmate.
1 Like
I think itâs much more likely that youâre not well mentally
OâDoherty at least stands to make some money from it and attract funding from the sort of far right US sources that you get your conspiracy theories from
You are totally out of step with the vast majority of Irish people, as are all far right thickos on this forum - and that has been proven again and again
Republicans are by and large stupid, which tallies nicely with you
This is where leftists expose themselves as utter simpletons.
Republicans are the party of the rich, whatever else they are the rich are definitely not stupid. Selfish and greedy maybe, but not stupid. In fact it is supremely stupid to refer to Republicans as stupid, especially when the ones making the claim are by and large wasters who are a drain on society.
Republican voters in the US are on average higher educated and have higher income than Democratic voters, the exception being most Hollywood celebrities and Silicon Valley billionaire CEOs.
There are many stupid rich people
Donald Trump most obviously
Rich people are often some the stupidest people around because they cannot see anything outside of their own selfish gratification
There are many different forms of stupidity - you are afflicted by pretty much all of them
You automatically assume money equals intellect and poverty equals stupidity
An utterly sickening attitude, typical of a shameless Republican
Republicans of course attract stupid people across socio-economic lines - right-wing parties everywhere tend to
You are the one that claimed American Republicans are stupid, which is incorrect. The facts are that Republican voters on average are higher educated and have higher income than Democratic voters. Doesnât mean there arenât intelligent poor people or stupid rich people, assuming you understand the word average. Agree there are different forms of stupidity, such as your own propensity for assuming anyone cares about your radicalized ideas.
Again you confuse money with intellect
Typical right-wing mistake to make
Itâs hilarious that you consistently vilify education and the US college system yet fall back on it as a crutch to suit your own argument
The fact is, stupid, selfish, racist and bigoted policies attract stupid, selfish, racist and bigoted people
You fall into all four categories, though I will allow for the fact that by falling into category 3 you also fall into category 4 automatically
Lolz - this is the guy who claims to be campaigning for Kamala Harris
Yet heâs totally against a core policy of hers
Sens. Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren, former Rep. Beto OâRourke, former Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary JuliĂĄn Castro, and former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper all promised that if they are elected president in 2020, workers in every state will earn no less than $15 an hour.
@anon7035031 was scathing of this post in his own typically know nothing way
Well, well, look what we have here 
The guy who claims to be campaigning for Kamala Harris seems to be totally off message, amazing stuff
Trump-supporting media - one of his favourite media outlets actually - show no sign of toning down the rhetoric
I donât think we should expect a condemnation - because this is the sort of rhetoric Trump is exceedingly comfortable with and absolutely wants out there
Still, though, him and his cult members are great craic and winding people up and destroying lives, and itâs hilarious, or something, at least if youâre to believe posters here
Wow, that is some way to spin a pair of lying cunts 
Sigh.
People have gone and lied to the masses for decades, doesnât make them good communicators.