That still doesnât answer why.
Wasnât one of the SW in a relationship with a cop in one of McCabeâs stations?
Which authority?
She wanted to be in on the Gda management campaign against McCabe? To what end, and to what personal benefit?
All of the Tribunal investigations and media coverage havenât come up with a plausible explanation other than her human error
She didnât come up with the idea herself Iâd imagine
Thereâs so much imagining, and so little evidence
1 Like
This proves everything 
The glove didnât fit OJ and a jury found him not guilty. I reckon he did it however without knowing the evidence. If it looks like a duck etcâŚ
Thereâs also no evidence that Gerry Adams was in the RA, nothing that could convict him anyway. I reckon he was though and I bet u do too?
Do you think a pattern of errors all going one direction is just a bizarre series of coincidences?
Exactly. Laura Brophy was definitely in on the fit-up so
The Tribunal surely would have uncovered a link or a malign hand behind all these errors, rather than one following from the other after the initial copy-and-paste.
Unless Laura Brophy on a beach in the Caribbean somewhere as a result of her devious machinations
A tribunal in Ireland finding anything other than the sort code of the barrister creaming it would be ground breaking.
1 Like
Establishment shill Raylan is siding with institutional corruption shocker.
Itâs surely a newsworthy national story at very least. Not as ground breaking obviously as Helen having a baby but worth a bye line in a small democracy like our own.
1 Like
the media would hide behind the in camera rule. then again they didnt when it was the roma children. funny that
1 Like
Sure Helen giving birth to the new messiah lifted the mood of the nation according to some journalist (i use that term lightly) in the Irish Times. 
Obviously the fact that the right wing nuts jumped on it doesnât help.
Is yer man aligned with the National Party?
Misogynist alert.