Youâve proved my point. I said you would run away from whatâs charged at you with nonsensical rubbish. Boris Johnson like you is an ardent supporter of Western imperialism and the neo-nazi Ukrainian military. I have no problem in calling out both Russian and Western imperialism, Iâm not aligned with either.
Can you address any of the below or will you just resort to the desperate lies you spout.
All you offer is desperate deflection tactics of misrepresenting others when your hypocrisy and insincerity is pointed out to you. Youâre not able to explain why you are unwilling to condemn or address the neo-Nazi elements of Ukraine military, the corruption of the Ukrainian govt, the tyrannical regimes, apartheid states and genocidal dictators the West have and continue to back. When these contradictions are called out, you wonât address them - youâll only sling mud. Youâre the perfect example of far right grift, dishonesty and propaganda.
We want to hear why youâve no issue with Western imperialism, their support for Israel and Saudi Arabia, the countless genocidal fascist dictators they helped to powers and supported in the past, the neo-Nazi regiments of Ukrainian military, Zelenskyâs zionism and trail of corruption. Youâre a complete and utter hypocrite and we all know you for the nasty little jumped up fascist you are.
The forum offers the chance to discuss all issues including how our policy of neutrality works, something which the majority what to strengthen to continue to allow that. That is something the public wants going by that poll.
The âno to NATOâ brigade set wonât allow any discussion whatsoever. For example, how can you not want any change but be happy for Britain to help police our skies? This is a point I made long ago here when it wasnât widely known what role the RAF played here.
It appears as though the likes of @Fulvio_From_Aughnacloy would prefer for Britain to oversee our sovereignty.
But weâre asking you? Are you above addressing your hypocrisy? I can say that you have pulled those selective quotes out of context as usual to try and shift the focus from yourself.
Itâs desperation tactics. You wonât address your lust for imperialism, for how you are happy to support neo-Nazis, how you are happy to support genocidal, apartheid fascist regimes. It shows you up as a vile cyncial, hypocrite. If you are so against fascism and neo-nazism then why canât you condemn Western support for Israel and Saudi Arabia? If you so for democray in Ukraine then why canât you address the serious question marks over Zelensky, the Pandora papers and his zionist links?
We all see that you donât have morals, you just believe in white supermacism and Western ideology should rule the world? Youâre a bigot and youâre a coward who is incapable of showing conviction if anything you say as you donât mean it.
Clare Daly trotted out a lot of glenshane and esteban et Alâs pro Russia talking points just there and was politely but quite comprehensively dismantled by the responses just there, made her look quite foolish I think. Wouldnât be hard says you.
Daly isnât pro Russian. Thatâs what right wing white supermacists like you try to unfairly tarnish here as. Sheâs a left leaning politician who wants a peaceful resolution in Ukraine and has a severe distaste for all the bloodshed by Western imperialism across the world.
The paucity of the quality of debate from the anti-NATO people is most instructive.
All shouting, all dumb soundbytes, personal attacks and non sequiturs.
Itâs fucking hilarious that so many of the people who shout âFree Palestineâ, which I think anybody with a grain of justice in their heart would agree with, are so anti-Ukraine.
The INTERNET has led so many people into holding totally ludicrous and totally contradictory positions which they cannot defend.
No one anywhere has mentioned ditching neutrality. Itâs only loony oddballs like yourself or Fulvio or Mick Wallace or Clare Daly that have said anything about ditching neutrality.
What an idiotic response. Why bother having the fora if theres no notion of ditching neutrality?
And to quote the minister of fart sniffing and defence
âIrelandâs commitment to a rules-based international order and our traditional policy of military neutrality do not inure us from the need to respond to this new reality.â
Who should defend Ireland and its waters in the event of an attack by a hostile country?
You can take âhostile countryâ as code for Russia in this case.
It seems to me that those most anti-NATO, including Sinn Fein, have one answer to this question which they donât like to voice: Britain. Britain should defend us.
