It isnât my fault if youâre not able to read.
Do you agree with @anon7035031âs definition of racism, by the way?
It isnât my fault if youâre not able to read.
Do you agree with @anon7035031âs definition of racism, by the way?
Tut tut
There was a marked absence of calls for the ignore function for a few months. But its back in fashion now. Not sure why.
This was a dead forum without me, and well you knowât.
BOX OFFICE.
Exhibit 426
Tut tut
Fascinating how the uneducated still canât tell the difference between being intolerant towards people and being intolerant towards the abhorrent ideas people hold.
For the nth time:
Being intolerant towards someone because their skin is different color = racism.
Being intolerant towards an ideology that believes in slicing off female genitalia, dropping gays off building to see if they bounce, etc. = someone whose ability to reason has take on board the advances since 18th century enlightenment.
Youâve changed your definition of racism so many times that itâs clear you have no idea what it actually is. Youâre hopping from Billy to Jack on the subject based on your own ever changing arbitrary definitions which appear to depend on nothing more than whether you like a certain poster or not.
The gas thing is that under the definition youâve most often used on this forum:
âŚthe comment by me you objected to (on post 2 of this thread) could not be racist - as i) the overwhelming majority of Italians are white, and Iâm white and (ii) it mentions precisely nothing about the superiority of one race over another.
The gas thing is you didnât even know the term âwopâ, which you used unironically (as opposed to the obvious irony of the context I used it in - I shouldnât have used it, fair enough), is a derogatory term in North America, where you reside and where Italians have suffered widespread racial discrimination. Itâs little known in Europe, where Italians have not suffered widespread racial discrimination.
Youâre always on about how it canât be racist to call for a ban on Islam (thatâs all Islam), which you have done, or at least called for an âargumentâ to be had about whether all Islam shoould be banned, as if this makes your comments much better and much less bigoted (it doesnât).
Yet here you admit that discrimination against the overwhelming majority of Muslims is racist.
Then you go one step further and deny that there is such a thing as a âmoderate Muslimâ, completely contradicting what you wrote in the previous quote, and confirming your racism (again, under your own criteria) against all Muslims.
Deary me. Thereâs a litany of racist neuroses youâve displayed.
Whatâs next in the calendar to send Sidney into a tailspin? Trumpâs election was the start of it but 2018 was really poor for him with him falling flat on the Belfast Trial and then the Kavanaugh hearings sending him off on a leave of absence. He doesnât take sport nearly as seriously so I donât think another Slippy G Liverpool bottling the league would do it.
I have you driven demented, mate.
Just admit it.
I love GAA first, CCFC,then anything Cork,know but what do you expect,Iâd follow cork in cricket if they had a county team
Keep posting lads. If the internet has taught us anything itâs that 2 lads on polar opposites of an argument will eventually meet in the middle. Iâd say about 10 years of this aul shite and ye will be besties. Pair of Gomies
29th March 2019
I would say this thread will do it. When you see him trawling through years of old posts to conjure up a flimsy argument, you know a mental breakdown is near.
You didnât see the irony of writing that in reply to Swastika Tim?
Nah, course you didnât.
Equating Muslims to the NazisâŚ
Jaysus, this thread isnât going well for poor @anon7035031 , is it?
And now heâs resorted to changing the thread title
When that happens, you know youâve won.
128,546
Renouncing Islam. Does this mean she is.a racist?
Iâll field this one.
No.