One court heard evidence and said he was. One court heard evidence and decided he wasnât.
Now Iâve answered two questions answer my question - why do you adopt a fascist approach to court decisions and reject any decision not in accordance with your bias and instinct
You still havenât answered the question.
Itâs gas the way you deliberately misrepresent everybody who disagrees with you (and youâve made a thoroughly clichĂŠd persona of being deliberately wrong about almost everything) and then you call them fascists because they quite rightly object to a disgraceful court verdict which was an utterly chilling attack both on free speech and on women.
To you, anybody who believes OJ Simpson is a double murderer is a âfascistâ. Anybody who believed the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four were innocent was a âfascistâ.
To do that, you have to disagree with appalling court verdicts. Disagreeing with appalling court verdicts is the hallmark of democracy.
Meanwhile, youâre all over other threads claiming you know more than medical science.
These are ludicrous, shrieking positions and they make you look like the fool you are.
The lack of self awareness is laugh out loud hilarious but thatâs always been your calling card.
Another fascist, Trumpian goal post shift. All court decisions are questionable now. Wow. You are a lot closer to the Trump voter than you care to imagine.
Whatâs your view on voter fraud - Iâm sure you can find some reference to it occurring in recent history.
You continue to decide cases based on your gut instinct and bias. Thatâs the fascist way.
Iâll stick with a judge and jury hearing evidence presented in accordance with rules of evidence and law. Thatâs the democratic way.
Good evening.
Youâre lashing out again after being out debated. Shrieking that anti-fascists are fascist is Fluvio the Mussolini supporterâs speciality.
Anyway youâre a Fine Gaeler so that makes it even funnier.
Itâs remarkable the projection you display in your posts.
Itâs hard to think of anything more fascist than cheerleading the mob rule decision to rule in favour of a very rich and famous celebrity against a woman who quite rightly referred to herself as a victim of domestic abuse.
A victim of domestic abuse at the hands of a man the UK courts quite rightly upheld as a wife beater.
When a victim cannot say they are a victim without the threat of ruination by a rich and famous celebrity and their online mob, that is fascism.
And you support that.
Donât think people have forgotten the way you wanted the complainant in the Jackson/Olding trial ruined. You have long form for this sort of thing.
Shock shock, Horror horror. Imagine being as juvenile as to not acknowledge/blatantly ignore whatâs going in the world due to being a moron disciple.
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1671262303319392259?t=IX9mVPy3VEgrHfFHgnANdQ&s=19
A dead man walking youâd fear. His LinkedIn is gone already.
Itâs a real insight to your approach to this site how many times you say this or something similar.
Different to a past-time, you use this place as a competitive hobby. Therefore, youâre not here to discuss or learn, hear genuine discourse or even just plain old chat shit. Youâre here to debate or more to the fact âout debateâ others.
Many end up having to quarrel or argue their point. You come here with that as your starting point.
Youâre literally complaining about people âhaving to argue their pointâ.
That line alone demonstrates that you donât understand the concept of a discussion forum.
The problem a lot of people here have with me - and it seems to be the problem you have too - is I consistently make eejits of people who cling to stupid opinions in the face of evidence.
These people do not have a wish to debate or understand anything, they only have a wish to shout.
Why should the feelings of reactionary right wing idiots be spared? I thought reactionary right wing were supposed to be all about âfree speechâ? Theyâre all about free speech until they hear opinions they donât like.
Thatâs not it at all and appears your lacking of listening leads straight to your one way diatribes you like to call âdebatesâ.
I actually think you revel in trying to be central in absolutely everything. Youre here for no reason then fulfilling your desire for âdebateâ. Kind of ruins the place for a lot of others- guess thatâs what I came to really say.
Anyway, as you were I suppose, donât expect much change from you.
But it is exactly it. I actually debate and put forward my views. I explain why I hold views.
There are very few people who do this.
The people who donât do this tend to be the people who complain that others do.
They are afraid of their stupid opinions being exposed for what they are.
There are several posters on this forum who ruin the place. They provide absolutely nothing of value here and their contributions are limited to bigotry, disinformation, aggro and spamming.
@Fulvio_From_Aughnacloy is clearly the worst offender, but heâs far the only one.
@ttownboy, @gaillimhmick, @maroonandwhite, @glenshane, @Thomas_Brady etc, all provide the square root of fuck all to this forum and push other good posters and potential good posters away. They function here like right wing bots do on Twitter - drown out debate with mindless noise.
You donât.
Absolute and utter horseshit. People have been chasing you for years around here now asking you how you can square off you support for the West and all the blood on its hands from backing tyrannical apartheid regimes in Saudi Arabia and Israel. How you can ignore neo-Nazi regiments in the Ukrainian military, the zionist leanings of Zelenksy and his name cropping up in the Pandora papers.
And we wonât get an answer, you will respond by desperately using lies and misrepresentations of other views. When pressed on you many disingenuous false positions you never address the contradictions, you run away and instead try and attack those asking with lies and usually spill over into veiled personal threats about contacting their employers or such nonsense.
Youâre a very nasty and dangerous individual.
Your words:
Endless repetitive lengthy diatribe arguments with the likes of labane and Fulvio et al arenât really debates. I get that you enjoy dismantling them but itâs fish in a barrell really.
Thatâs deflection though.
I asked you questions on your own hypocrisies and far right ideology and you wonât address them. All you can do is consistently pull up a number of out of context quotes that have nothing to do with questions addressed to yourself.
Fulvio is a fascist spammer. He has a few stock posts of abuse which he endlessly puts out on repeat, changing a few words each time.
The time has come again for a banning, no question.
Yes he is. You enjoy getting into the endless back and forths with him. Fair enough if you enjoy it but Iâd suggest itâs not debate and itâs well beneath your level.
No debate is ever possible with him because heâs such a spammer.
You can only put up his own words to hilariously expose him as the absolute fraud of a human being he is.
Heâs one of the very few people around where the only sensible response is to mercilessly bully.
Bully the bully. Hammer the hammerhead.
It was @TheUlteriorMotive who called you out yesterday about you falsely accusing others of what you are yoursellf. This is you again. After it happened yesterday, you decided to threaten him twice about being unfit to mentor kids and made a veiled threat that you would go to Kilmacud Crokes to report him.
@Rocko are you going to continue to hide away from this?
