My take is that the two of them didn’t have prove of where they came from but shoehorned in things to make it appear as if they did.
The differences in the messages is impossible to explain. Why would one say Clonskeagh and the other Dublin 8? Some of the screenshots are cropped and others aren’t. Why the need for that?
In terms of the story as I know it, I personally don’t see how this really advantages anyone. @artfoley says above that this would make the other organisation seem like they have more of an in with Varadkar, how? The WhatsApp’s themselves say they shouldn’t say where they have come from.
I just don’t see where the advantage lies personally, happy to be corrected on this though.
But how did this advantage anyone? I just don’t see it.
My guess is as a rival organisation that were impacted by this but not a party to it that there was a hell of a lot of curiosity on the details of this.
So it was a HoA rather than a contract and the terms were agreed pending ratification by IMO members? That’s a bit different to suggesting it was still under substantial negotiation.
Did the NAGP do anything with this apparently precious info that they got handed? If not - why not?
I’m still struggling to see what the benefit of getting this document was other than getting a heads-up. It’s a version of local politicians being told that some grant money or abroad project is coming the way of their constituency - they had no influence over the decision but use it to portray themselves in that way.
Actually Leo’s argument that it was part of an effort to secure the deal, however inappropriately and informally it was done, seems the most plausible.
And if Leo wanted to undermine it he could have done it far easier being Taoiseach etc. I don’t see why he would want to undermine it though seeing as it was being touted as a political achievement.
Just reading about it, it’s strange the way that the IMO could negotiate but the NAGP would be “consulted”. Seems a strange thing in practice, we always end up with too many voices at the table in Union negotiations.
Has there been any analysis of what was in the Heads that wasn’t in the extensive press release from the IMO in early April? In other words, do we know what was still confidential information?