Fuck off out of it you mad cunt.
You keep asking me questions. And I keep answering them. The fact you do not like the answers is neither here nor there in a significant sense.
Now, reallyâŚ
Is not interesting who brings up certain topics?
This whole playbook is highly familiar from all the noxious populist right wing hatreds.
Lads give away so much about themselves, without the slightest sense of doing so.
Observe the level of brain dead populist guff with which I was dealing. The GAA get money from âThe ExchequerââŚ
Why is acceptable for GGA clubs named after slavers to get grants?
Eh, you brought up my post
https://www.asc.ox.ac.uk/codrington-legacy
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/black-boy-lane-tottenham-renamed-8073552
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14660970.2023.2167820
The tentacles of slaveryâs legacy are everywhere, as any sensible person knows. To single out the fact that a few GAA clubs are called after John Mitchel is asinine â but typical of a soccer head clown. For the record, I would have no problem with those GAA clubs being renamed.
Yes, because you are another anti GAA gobdaw soccer head.
Your own words are there for everyone to see. Some people have a ferocious preoccupation with paedophilia.
You havenât answered why you decide to derail threads constantly. Again this isnât your blog, whatâs the point in being here?
More of his âcraicâ I assume. âYour maâ level jokes that probably gets a bit of traction in whatever grief hole he drinks in too many times a week.
He doesnât like it back or to be questioned and has a grudge against people when they call him out on it.
And youâre on the record of slagging off rugby. Who gives a fuck? I discuss a variety of topics with GGA heads on other threads, as does @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy . You seem to take it personally that we arenât all interested in your musings about stick fighting.
You have an extremely loose way with description. I do not derail threads âconstantlyâ. The latest tranche started here when I posted a highly relevant Guardian article in this thread. Take a look.
What actually happens is that a crew of around six people, including you, follow me around the place, yapping at my heels, yapping the same yap all the time. I find it the whole process extremely tedious. But the reality is that none of ye have the ability to lay a glove on me. Desisting from following me around would be a far more logical option.
And youâre on the record of slagging off rugby. Who gives a fuck? I discuss a variety of topics with GGA heads on other threads, as does @The_Selfish_Giant . You seem to take it personally that we arenât all interested in your musings about stick fighting.
I cannot recall ever saying anything too negative about rugby, if only because I quite enjoy rugby, have been to a fair few rugby matches, used drink in the rugby pub in Kilkenny (before its owner died in 2020) and prefer rugby to soccer. But people constantly invent a fantasy around what I supposedly saidâŚ
As for my âmusingsâ â which I never discuss here or post here, best of recollection â and use of the term âstickfightingâ⌠That intellect level is these flutes:
You do realize you are now hijacking this thread?
This fella is still raving
This fella is still raving
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://nda.ptools.net/nda-files/Presentations-Transcripts-Annual-Conference-2017/Elisa-O-Donovan.pdf
But you see there is your problem in a nutshell, as factual means indisputable and there is nothing indisputible about Covid, not in 2020 and not now. Like all of science there are hypotheses that can be tested and maybe eventually lead to a theory, but even then rarely in science do you hear the term factual or true. Literally all theories are eventually overturned as we learn more, Einstein was wrong about quantum mechanics and most likely wrong about even his own field of relatively.
Itâs understandable that yourself and the other lads with liberal arts degrees, who probably studied a bit of philosophy, to fall into this trap. You are used to thinking in terms of proofs and truths, but itâs not applicable to science.
Itâs perfectly acceptable to admit you were wrong in the past, in fact itâs the hallmark of a good scientist.
âFactualâ does not necessarily mean âindisputableâ. That spin is a piece of rhetoric on your part, a wriggle away from the fact that you were notably incorrect in certain statements on Swedish Covid policy. You said, for instance, no schools in Sweden closed. That statement was factually incorrect â and will always be factually incorrect â since Swedish secondary schools did close.
You might be a little embarrassed to make such a howler, since âSwedenâ is such a shibboleth for you, but there it is, a fact.
Smart people are smart people. Doing a STEM degree will not make a stupid person smart. Ditto for a stupid person doing a Liberal Arts degree. I have no hang ups on this front.
I am perfectly well aware, in laymanâs terms, of the implications of classic work by Georg Cantor, Erwin SchrĂśdinger, Werner Heisenberg and many others around questions of certainty and decidability. But philosophers still have a part to play. Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Certainty: âIf e.g. someone says âI donât know if thereâs a hand hereâ he might be told âLook closerâ.â
You might have looked a bit closer at Sweden in 2020.
Why do you have so many posters who you just serve up picture replies and abuse to?
You do it because you live the attention. Youâd block a lot of posters otherwise and just engage in conversation.
You are more than capable of engaging in a proper conversation but are unable to do so with a lot of people due to a mixture of ego and stubbornness.