i) The Government is taking the advice of NPHET. In which case, why muzzle NPHET?
ii) The Government is not taking the advice of NPHET. If so, what is the rationale for rejecting the advice of NPHET? Whereās the transparency about why they are doing so?
Again, either scenario is not transparent. And therefore terrible governance.
That you and a load of other posters have now turned into Fine Gael lickspittles is laugh out loud hilarious.
Yis are literally demanding secrecy. Why not go the whole hog and just call for the abolishing of democracy?
Sorry to go back to it but thereās a whole flip side to your point here that youāre not considering. ie - If the government follow NPHET advice then whatās the point in NPHET giving interviews? Thereās an inherent confirmation basis underpinning your point here.
NPHET have leaked at various points. In October 2020 they were leaking everywhere to try and force a lockdown. That leaking stopped after the Government implemented one and also gave out about the leaking.
The Government ārejectingā NPHET advice last Christmas wasnāt leaked and the Government didnāt have an issue. Itās important to note that there were no issues with NPHET being muzzled- their advice was on the record and called back to repeatedly in January. If you go even further back, NPHET had asked for mandatory quarantine for travellers in a letter in May 2020 and it was rejected, the advice was there for all to see but the idiot journos and Twitterati who became Zero Coviders in January 2021 only noticed it then.
God bless yer stamina lads. The next two hundred thousand posts are vital, I can see someone being swayed to change their minds by the merits of the others argument before this is over. Itās too early to call yet though
David Quinn is very unhappy with a proposal to implement a varied 30 or 40 km/hr speed limit in some urban areas.
Nothing screams āfreedomā like the right to force raped women to give birth and then run the child over with your American right wing dark money funded SUV.
Dave is the sort of guy thatās after your own little heart, bless you.
I explained why the government made its decision. You ignored that and repeated the same question back again. This is stupid.
Your scenario is false. Iāve explained why. I donāt see why you are repeating it again.
You want to change how our democracy functions in one discrete policy area in order to align with your views and are calling anyone that disagrees with undemocratic. You are unhinged.
There are three pillars to NPHETās advice tbf and Holohan always cites them. One of them is to keep schools open, that was put in there by Martin when he was appointed because Holohan had refused to allow schools to be reopened in line with the rest of Europe in May 2020. Martin had to spend enormous political capital to get that in and try to maintain it because Holohan would probably have shut them otherwise.
Ok as ever there comes a point when debating with Sid that youāre talking with someone with the emotional age of a 12 year old.
This point has been reached so this will hopefully be my last post on this thread today and I will not be engaging further.
Youāre misunderstanding my point.
I was aware that you had made these points on TFK, in fact I remembered you making them.
My point, which you failed to grasp, was that you are a parasitic waster who spends his entire life on TFK and never does anything useful for anyone. Making these points on TFK did absolutely nothing for anybody, including yourself. In fact, it probably just damaged you further to waste another day of your precious life on this site.
It would have been a fine contribution to our public life to make those points publicly, by writing to a politician about them perhaps, but you have made a very deliberate decision that you will never make any contribution to the country ever.
That was my point. It was a rhetorical question. I apologise for confusing you. I should have remembered ā¦ [I actually donāt even have the heart to finish this sentence]
We are in agreement that internal NPHET discussions should be subject to the Freedom of Information Act.