The @Sidney is not a racist thread. NOT a racist

[Sidney]

I’ve just pointed out in stark terms how you are unbelievable racist.

Will you reply to the charge?

Do you agree with @anon7035031’s definition of racism and do you agree that you are part of a “clique” which is perfectly fine with flagrant racism, as displayed by @anon7035031 and yourself?

[maroonandwhite]

Virtue signalling after overt racism. Bewildering

[Sidney]

Racism is apparently the new virtue signalling. There are loads of posters here who think racism is a virtue.

By signalling racism, they’re signalling “virtue”.

[Sidney]

You’re “virtue signalling” racism mate.

[glenshane]

Desperately pointing the finger at all and sundry in a bid to divert attention from his own deeply unsavoury beliefs.
He should have just apologised.

[Sidney]

It isn’t my fault if you’re not able to read.

Do you agree with @anon7035031’s definition of racism, by the way?

@anon7035031

racism is claiming superiority of one race over another.

[Sidney]

Tut tut

@anon7035031

There is an argument to be made that Islam should be outlawed in civilized societies.

[maroonandwhite]

There was a marked absence of calls for the ignore function for a few months. But its back in fashion now. Not sure why.

[Sidney]

This was a dead forum without me, and well you know’t.

BOX OFFICE.

[glenshane]

@Sidney

This was a dead forum without me, and well you know’t.

BOX OFFICE

Exhibit 426

[Sidney]

Tut tut

@maroonandwhite

Its boring me stupid replying to them but if i had to go home to a bought gook wife or a father who shite himself in front of the paratroopers id be bitter and twisted too.

@maroonandwhite

Still got nothing, but your bought gook wife. Awwww

[anon7035031]

Fascinating how the uneducated still can’t tell the difference between being intolerant towards people and being intolerant towards the abhorrent ideas people hold.

For the nth time:

Being intolerant towards someone because their skin is different color = racism.

Being intolerant towards an ideology that believes in slicing off female genitalia, dropping gays off building to see if they bounce, etc. = someone whose ability to reason has take on board the advances since 18th century enlightenment.

[Sidney]

@anon7035031

Being intolerant towards someone because their skin is different color = racism.

You’ve changed your definition of racism so many times that it’s clear you have no idea what it actually is. You’re hopping from Billy to Jack on the subject based on your own ever changing arbitrary definitions which appear to depend on nothing more than whether you like a certain poster or not.

The gas thing is that under the definition you’ve most often used on this forum:

@anon7035031

racism is claiming superiority of one race over another.

@anon7035031

A racist is someone who believes that one race is superior to another.

…the comment by me you objected to (on post 2 of this thread) could not be racist - as i) the overwhelming majority of Italians are white, and I’m white and (ii) it mentions precisely nothing about the superiority of one race over another.

The gas thing is you didn’t even know the term “wop”, which you used unironically (as opposed to the obvious irony of the context I used it in - I shouldn’t have used it, fair enough), is a derogatory term in North America, where you reside and where Italians have suffered widespread racial discrimination. It’s little known in Europe, where Italians have not suffered widespread racial discrimination.

You’re always on about how it can’t be racist to call for a ban on Islam (that’s all Islam), which you have done, or at least called for an “argument” to be had about whether all Islam shoould be banned, as if this makes your comments much better and much less bigoted (it doesn’t).

@anon7035031

There is an argument to be made that Islam should be outlawed in civilized societies.

Yet here you admit that discrimination against the overwhelming majority of Muslims is racist.

@anon7035031

Unfairly discriminating against “moderate” Muslims who have no wish to wage jihad against the West or see Sharia law the law of the land is certainly “cultural racism”.

Then you go one step further and deny that there is such a thing as a “moderate Muslim”, completely contradicting what you wrote in the previous quote, and confirming your racism (again, under your own criteria) against all Muslims.

@anon7035031

The big lie in the Hasan article posted above, like all similar articles, is this myth of the moderate Muslim.

Deary me. There’s a litany of racist neuroses you’ve displayed.

[Tim_Riggins]

What’s next in the calendar to send Sidney into a tailspin? Trump’s election was the start of it but 2018 was really poor for him with him falling flat on the Belfast Trial and then the Kavanaugh hearings sending him off on a leave of absence. He doesn’t take sport nearly as seriously so I don’t think another Slippy G Liverpool bottling the league would do it.

[Sidney]

I have you driven demented, mate.

Just admit it.

[Corksfinedtboy]

I love GAA first, CCFC,then anything Cork,know but what do you expect,I’d follow cork in cricket if they had a county team

[anon78624367]

Keep posting lads. If the internet has taught us anything it’s that 2 lads on polar opposites of an argument will eventually meet in the middle. I’d say about 10 years of this aul shite and ye will be besties. Pair of Gomies

[Enrique]

29th March 2019

[anon7035031]

I would say this thread will do it. When you see him trawling through years of old posts to conjure up a flimsy argument, you know a mental breakdown is near.

[Sidney]

You didn’t see the irony of writing that in reply to Swastika Tim?

Nah, course you didn’t.